Answer:
I can tell you that number 2 happens first then number 1 happens next, I'll try to figure this out if I can.
1. the legislative branch of government (Congress) examines a proposed bill and can either reject or vote to make it into a law.
2: when Congress votes in favor of making a bill into law, the Executive branch of government ( the president) signs it into law. If the president does not approve of the bill, he/she can veto it, and send recommendations to Congress to amend the bill.
if Congress approves a bill 2/3 or more of both the house and Senate, it shall become a law, and the president cant veto it.
3: The judicial branch of government (the supreme Court) interprets laws and upholds the constitution. When disagreements occur between the legislative and executive branches of government, the judicial branch has the power to resolve the disagreement by interpreting the law in view of existing laws and the consitution.
4: the varying roles of the three branches of government prove a system of checks and balances so that no branch of government can abuse power or authority over the governed.
The argument Oliver Wendell Holmes was making in this quotation about how the federal system works is that:
- "The Supreme Court needs to be able to settle disputes between the states and the federal government by reviewing the constitutionality of state laws."
- This is evident when he said, "I do think the Union would be imperiled if we could not make the declaration as to the laws of several States."
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that Oliver Wendell Holmes felt for the federal system to work, the Supreme court should be able to make the distinction between federal and state laws.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/17812433
Polk sent orders to the U.S. Navy in the Pacific to seize San Francisco Bay and other California ports in the event of war with Mexico in 1845 as part of his California strategy.
It is clear from their respective historical contexts that "Clay supported founding the National Bank, which Jackson opposed" is the aptest phrase comparing and contrasting Henry Clay and Andrew Jackson's political stances. This is further explained below.
<h3>What was Henry Clay's contribution?</h3>
Generally, In 1831 Henry Clay, as the head of the Senate, backed the formation of the national bank but Andrew Jackson opposed it based on a lack of funds for West development.
In conclusion, From a historical perspective, "Clay supported founding the National Bank, which Jackson opposed" is the most illuminating comparative or contrastive statement between Henry Clay and Andrew Jackson's political ideologies.
Read more about Henry Clay
brainly.com/question/11628598
#SPJ1