Rodney King case illuminate the differences between how black and white Americans saw the police and the justice system is explained.
<h3>What was Rodney King case?</h3>
The Rodney King case illustration, that the police profit from a double standard when defining illegal activity, which causes minorities to have a negative perception of the police.
Some key feature of this case are-
- As the Los Angeles riots that followed the acquittal of the white police officers accused of beating the black motorist showed, this cynicism can lead to civil unrest.
- Only the serious possibility of criminal prosecution will have an influence on police wrongdoing because civil lawsuits and civilian review boards have failed to stop police brutality.
- The existing situation, in which almost all prosecutors choose not to launch a meaningful challenge to widespread police brutality, may be improved with citizen access to a grand jury.
To know more about the challenges faced by minorities (African Americans) in U.S, here
brainly.com/question/4378535
#SPJ4
Answer:
I'm pretty sure the answer is Thunder
the anti-immigration political party founded by “nativists” was known as the Know-nothing party
Social media can at times Weaken our inhibitions or internal censors, emboldening us to write things or post images.
Our contacts with others on social media frequently result in "weak bonds," meaning that we don't feel as personally connected to them as we do when we speak to them in person. Consequently, even while we communicate more, we may not necessarily be strengthening our relationships as much.
When we connect via social media, we frequently trust the individuals receiving our messages, which results in generally more honest conversation. Second, we tend not to deepen our relationships—they tend to remain in the status quo—because social media does not strengthen our social ties as much as face-to-face interaction does. Finally, we don't receive the same variety of ideas as we once did because we frequently contact and follow people who share our opinions.
Learn more about censors https://brainly.in/question/6357532
#SPJ4
According to the identity perspective, <u>Militant Nationalism </u>focused on cultural and racial differences and advocated an aggressive, heroic approach to international relations.
<h3>What is militant nationalism?</h3>
In the latter half of the 19th century , militant nationalism emerged in Europe. It meant outright wars by the European countries to achieve their goals.
Militant nationalism included two main features: First, the dangerous and burdensome mechanism of keeping great standing armies and large navies. This was accompanied by the evils of espionage , suspicion, fear and hatred. Second, the existence of a powerful class of military and naval officers, headed by staff, who tend to dominate, especially at a time of political crisis, over the civilian authorities. Militant nationalism was caused by aggressive nationalism, economic competition and international tension.
Therefore, we can say that Militant Nationalism focused on cultural and racial differences and advocated an aggressive, heroic approach to international relations.
Learn more about Militant Nationalism on:
brainly.com/question/20700164
#SPJ4
