Answer:
<u>True</u>
Explanation:
According to the IRS tax guidelines in such a case the unreimbursed amount is deductible as an itemized deduction from tax returns.
What this implies for Mr. and Mrs. Jones is that the $12,000 unreimbursed amount would be deducted from their tax return. <u>Thus, reducing the amount of taxes to be paid by them.</u>
Answer:
The correct option is D) Looking across complementary offerings
Explanation:
There are about 6 well-known paths to achieving a <em>Blue Ocean Strategy.</em>
Generally, the Blue Ocean Strategy (BOS) seeks to avoid locking horns with the competition by identifying niche areas that are critical to the attainment of a competition-free space. According to the BOS took kit, there are 6 paths to achieving a blue ocean strategy.
One of them is called looking across complementary offerings.
Another term for the Curve is Value Ramp. Value Ramp simply refers to a methodology for evaluating one's service/product offerings. It consists of a graph that plots a curve sloping upwards from left to right, showing the relationship between price and the value or perception of value being delivered by the business.
The principle offered here stated that the higher the perception of one's brand, the more one should be able to charge for their services.
Value is thought to increase as the business delivers more and more personalized services in a relationship-oriented fashion rather than generic products and services which are readily available off the shelf in most cases.
Cheers
Answer:
$2,250 favorable
Explanation:
The direct material price variance is computed as;
= ( Standard price - Actual price ) × Actual quantity
Given that;
Standard price = $8.75
Actual price = $8
Actual quantity = 3,000 units
Direct material price variance
= ( $8.75 - $8 ) × 3,000
= ( $0.75 ) × 3,000
= $2,250 favorable
Answer:
If we made the assumption that both countries had a per capita of $15,000 in 1960, country A, which entered an era of political stability, and applied liberal reforms, growing at a rate of 5%, would double its GDP per capita by 1975, reaching a GDP per capita of $31,183.92.
On the contrary, country B, which continued to grow by 1% per year, would only double its GDP per capita by 2030, reaching a figure of $30,101.45.
Therefore, it would take 55 years more for country B to double its per capita GDP level compared to country A.
Expenses decreases retained earnings; therefore, to increase any expense, one would debit the expense account
What does retained earnings mean?
Retained earnings are profits retained in the business for reinvestment and for expansion purposes, in essence, expenses would reduce the retained earnings, the higher the expenses, the lesser the retained earnings become.
From a double entry point of view, an increase in expenses would be debited to expense account and a decrease is credited instead.
Find out more retained earnings on:brainly.com/question/15175380
#SPJ1
