Answer:
He vetoed it.
Explanation:
The Second Bank of the US was created in 1816 because the First Bank’s charter expired and there was no central bank to regulate state banks.
Because of that, the US Congress passed a law that chartered the Second Bank of the US, it was created to help the national treasury.
President Jackson vetoed the recharter of the Second Bank, he believed that this institution endangered the foundations of American liberty and democracy because it encouraged imbalance of power between rich and poor.
The correct answer is:
C. The eastern orthodox church became bitterly divided.
Explanation:
Iconoclasm refers to the belief that there should not be religious or sacred images, pictures or monuments because they are mistaken into idolatry. Iconoclasm is usually a dispute between two groups in the same religion.
Emperor Leo II and later Emperor Leo V, both opposed to portraits of Christ and Saints, this created controversy between supporters of iconoclasm and those who opposed, dividing the Eastern Orthodox Church.
Answer:
Credit
Explanation:
Hamilton believed that the establishment of national debt and the paying off would increase the credit line of the new Nation which would, in turn, allow the new nation to build and expand.
<em>The mobs smashed newly invented machines as a form of protest against the insertion of the machines in textile industry. The machines changed the whole process of production and competition in the marketing, the machines speed up the production process in some case 100 times more than what a human would spend to do a job. So the machinery threatens human jobs positions and salaries in the factories. </em>
<u>Answer:</u>
E. The court can hear only cases that have worked their way up from local courts.
This statement about the Supreme Court is true.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Clients or entities who are not happy with the jurisdiction and result of the lower courts can apply the request or petition at the U.S Supreme Court to hear their case. One can ask for the review of the case by asking it to grant a "writ of certiorari".
This means the lower court where the case was initially filed has to send a copy to the Supreme court for review. It generally never hears cases as such until the case is of national significance or the result of a case might harmonize a conflicting decision to settle or when it might have precedential value.
