1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ratling [72]
2 years ago
10

The government of Canada is a constitutional monarchy. Given this information, which of these would be the "head of state" of Ca

nada?
A) The Queen of England
B) The President of Canada
C) The Prime Minister of Canada
D) The Prime Minister of England
History
1 answer:
andriy [413]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

C

Explanation:

If it was a constitutional monarchy it would have a prime minister. And it would be the prime minister of Canada not England

You might be interested in
Using reputable online news sources, find an article about a current event that has happened within the last 12 months that deal
kodGreya [7K]

Answer:

Religious tolerance in the current scenario is discussed below in details.

Explanation:

Religious toleration is citizens supporting other citizens to meditate or exercise other religions and faiths.

In a country with a state religion for example Arab countries where the state religion is Islam, toleration indicates that the government supports other religions to be there. Many nations in past centuries permitted other religions but only in isolation. This has become rare nowadays, religious toleration especially in Islam following states become very rare.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why would the Nazis use the murder of one man in Paris to incite violence against an entire
Svetach [21]

Answer:

Because of the quality of fear in man which is the only cause that made Nazis powerful.

Because of fear it was easy for the Nazis to spread fear by killing only one man.. It's a human psychology

5 0
2 years ago
Was it possible for the US to definitively win the vietnam war?
eimsori [14]

Answer:

never say never anything is potentially possible, it just depends on how many reasorces the us deployed into it. If theoreticly they spent eveything they had into the world they would definitvely win the war. (sorry if this doesnt' exactly answer the hw question I had no idea how long to make it sry)

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Did the expansion of the federal government from 1825-1836 weaken or strengthen the United states of America
fgiga [73]

Answer:

Without a doubt the expansion strengthens the United States. Greatest occasion in the development of the federal government was the Common War, which set up its in-comparability over the states. The Common War carried a lot of new capacity to the central government, and laid the basis for the development of interest groups.

Explanation:

The primary significant occasion in the development of the federal government was the endorsement of the Constitution in 1789. Before that, the US was administered under the Articles of Confederation. The Constitution is habitually commended as an archive that secures the privileges of people and restricts the forces of government. In any case, an examination of the Constitution with the Articles uncovers that the polar opposite is valid. Under the Constitution the government acquired force, was less responsible, and had more noteworthy scope to decide its own extent of activity. That is the thing that the Constitution was planned to achieve.

The Constitution set up the Constituent School for the choice of presidents, however indicated no technique for picking balloters. A few strategies were utilized, however in many states the lawmaking bodies picked them. The composers expected that in many races no up-and-comer would get a lion's share of discretionary votes. That would allow the Place of Delegates to name the president from the five top discretionary vote getters. That framework never filled in as imagined, and by 1828, with the appointment of Andrew Jackson, the current arrangement of famous deciding in favor of balloters had gotten immovably settled in, and alongside it the gathering framework. From that point on, fruitful applicants owed their prosperity to the help of their gatherings, and consequently utilized the political framework to remunerate the individuals who assisted them with getting chosen.

3 0
2 years ago
3. How does the president limit the legislative powers of congress?
kogti [31]

Correct answer choice for question 3 is :

D) By using the veto

Explanation:

When the president determines to deny a bill, the Congress can vote on it again. If two-thirds of the Congress vote in support of the proposal, they revoke the veto. The bill becomes a law. The legislative department can evaluate rules made by Congress and signed by the president. The president's powers are restricted in the method of limits and stability. As the head of the governing department, the president assures the implementation of the regulations in our country.

____________________________________________________________

Correct answer choice for question 4 is :

A) He appoints all federal judges

Explanation:

Constitutionally, the President of the USA may not restrict the authority of the judiciary section. The Constitution is the base for all American laws, and the US Supreme Court is the final authority on what is or is not legal. The only authority the President has on the Supreme Court is the capability to elect judges to that court, with Congressional support. Which means the prevailing authority and the Conservative Congress will be struggling for a moderate judge whose version of the law is more to their desire.

____________________________________________________________

Correct answer choice for question 5 is :

B) Commutation

Explanation:

The president's power to replace a condemned person's decision to make the penalty less severe is called Commutation. Presidents have restricted the ability to act unilaterally or make management judgments on their own. Presidents have used official orders as a way of performing important plans unilaterally. Using an event-count review, the incidence of administrative orders changes with substantive reforms in the president's legislative situation.

____________________________________________________________

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which type of essay requires you to examine and analyze primary source documents?
    10·1 answer
  • Why did the conquering Spaniards name their new colony Mexico?
    13·1 answer
  • How many books did Harriet beecher stowe write?
    15·2 answers
  • Who did the Roman use fasces for ?
    15·2 answers
  • In order to determine the distance between two cities on a map,which map feature would a student have to use
    13·2 answers
  • What is solar thermal energy used to do- heat homes or power homes?
    6·2 answers
  • Help PLEASE ineed please help me​
    10·2 answers
  • PLS HELP!!
    13·2 answers
  • Why did the Colonists have an advantage over the British in fighting the Revolutionary War?
    14·2 answers
  • (HC)Why did Civil Rights leaders expect that World War II would help their movement reach its goals more quickly?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!