All categories

3 years ago

Select three food manufacturers.

Business

2 answers:

Helen [10]3 years ago

3 0

Kraft, General Mills, Kellogg’s

dimaraw [331]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

The three food manufacturers are

Kraft

General Mills

Kellogg’s

Explanation:

The food demand and agrarian products are changing in exceptional manners. Increments in per capita earnings, higher urbanization, and the developing quantities of ladies in the workforce induce more prominent interest in high-esteem items, handled items, and prepared arranged nourishments. The nature and degree of the changing structure of agri-food requests offer exceptional open doors for broadening and worth expansion in farming, especially in creating nations. The quickened development of agro-ventures in creating societies too

You might be interested in

Fire hazards associated with painting can be reduced by

MrRissso [65]

Keeping the paint away from an open flame.

7 0

3 years ago

Suppose you purchase a 10-year bond with 6.5 % annual coupons. You hold the bond for four years, and sell it immediately after

Andrews [41]

Answer:

a. What cash flows will you pay and receive from your investment in the bond per $ 100 face value?

Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4

-$109,13 $6,50 $6,50 $6,50 $112,53 (6,5+106,03)

b. What is the annual rate of return of your investment?

5,3%, the YTM of the bond.

Explanation:

If the YTM of the bond does not change during the year, it means that at the time the bond was sold, the total rate of return would be the same as was when the bonds were purchased, in this case 5,3%.

Bond Value

Principal Present Value = F / (1 + r)^t

Coupon Present Value = C x [1 - 1/(1 +r)^t] / r

Price of the Bond at the moment it was purchased:

The price of this bond it's $59,66 + $6,5 = $109,13

Present Value of Bonds $59,66 = $100/(1+0,053)^10

Present Value of Coupons $49,47 = $6,5 (Coupon) x 7,61

7,61 = [1 - 1/(1+0,053)^10 ]/ 0,053

Price of the Bond 4 years later:

The price of this bond it's $73,66 + $32,68 = $106,03

Present Value of Bonds $73,66 = $100/(1+0,053)^6

Present Value of Coupons $32,68 = $6,50 (Coupon) x 5,03

5,03 = [1 - 1/(1+0,053)^6 ]/ 0,053

4 0

4 years ago

Force Corporation is owned equally by Luke and his sister Leia, each of whom own 200 shares in the company. Force redeemed 100 s

murzikaleks [220]

Complete question:

Force Corporation is owned equally by Luke and his sister Leia, each of whom own 200 shares in the company. Force redeemed 100 shares of Luke’s stock in the company on December 31 of this year paying Luke $1,000 per share. Luke’s income tax basis in each share is $500. Force has total E&P of $800,000. What are the tax consequences to Luke as a result of the stock redemption?

a)$50,000 capital gain and a tax basis in each of his remaining shares of $500.

b)$50,000 capital gain and a tax basis in each of his remaining shares of $1,000.

c)$100,000 dividend and a tax basis in each of his remaining shares of $500.

d)$100,000 dividend and a tax basis in each of his remaining shares of $1,000.

Answer:

$50,000 capital gain and a tax basis in each of his remaining shares of $500.

Solution:

The sale should be viewed as an swap as Luke decreases the shareholding from 50 per cent (200/400) to 33 per cent (100/300).

Luke is not regarded as the shareholder of any property held by his dad.

Luke records a capital benefit of $50,000, measured as $100,000 – $50,000.

∴ $50,000 capital gain and a tax basis in each of his remaining shares of $500.

7 0

3 years ago

Harlan Bikes wants to close an unprofitable division with an expensive mortgage, high advertising costs, and high raw material c

Rudiy27

Answer:

Quantitatively, Harlan Bikes is justified in deciding to close the department, but there are other qualitative factors that need to be considered which may result in the company loosing much more that they can save if the department is closed, such as for example a decrease in employee morale, a negative signalling effect to other stakeholders, a drop in sales in related products etc.

Explanation:

A decrease in employee morale can result especially if workers in other departments are no-longer sure about their future in the company, resulting from fears of their departments being closed. This can negatively affect productivity resulting in lower profits in other department.

A negative signalling effect means that other stakeholders such as investors and creditors may start questioning managements ability to profitably run the business, and the company will be perceived as more risky. Cost of debt and cost of equity capital for example, may go up, due to this higher perceived risk, and which may reduce the number of positive net present value projects that the company can undertake due to an increase in cost of capital.

If the company carries related products in other departments, it may also see a drop in sales in those sales, which will effectively reduced the savings that are estimated to be gained from closing the division.

7 0

3 years ago

What is an example of a situation in which the cost of capacity is substantially more than the cost of waiting? What would the w

labwork [276]

Answer:

Cost of Capacity, Cost of Waiting and Waiting Lines which are concepts indicated in the question speaks to Queuing Theory under Operations Management.

The goal of studying this theory simply relates to Optimizing Efficiency.

Let's define the concepts highlighted in the question.

Capacity cost is defined as the total amount of expenses incurred by an organization to provide for or increase its ability to conduct business operations. It can also be referred to as the cost of service.

Cost of Waiting on the hand within the context indicated above is how much it costs a business to keep customers waiting.

The more customers leave without making a purchase or do not return because of frustrating wait times, the higher the waiting cost.

Waiting Line - This is simply a line of people waiting to be attended to, or access a product or service. It could also refer to Assembly Line. Or simply, a queue.

Explanation:

Cost of Waiting plus Cost of Service equals Total Cost.

An optimized situation is where the total cost is at it's lowest. Reducing capacity may reduce costs of service, but cause an upward spike loss of sales due to lost customers.

Excessive capacity, on the other hand, will reduce the loss of sales due to the loss of customers but lead to an increase in operating costs.

To answer the questions, an example of a situation in which the cost of capacity is substantially more than the cost of waiting is given below:

a) If One ATM can serve 3 customer in 2 Minutes, and ATM users arrive the ATM Gallery at the rate of 3 customers every 4 minutes, then haveing 5 ATM Machines installed at such a location would translate to higher cost of capacity in relation to cost of waiting (Assuming that the cost of purchasing the machines and profit accruable from the ATM use charges are not factors under consideration)

b) the waiting line in such a condition would be substantially smaller than an optimised gallery or close to zero

Cheers!

3 0

3 years ago