Answer:
The answer is: the real gain in real GDP between 2010 and 2000 is 18.34%
Explanation:
First we have to determine the real GDP using the GDP deflator.
GDP deflator = (nominal GDP / real GDP) x 100
For year 2000:
24 = ($672 billion / real GDP ) x 100
2,400 = $672 billion / real GDP
real GDP = $0.28 billion
For year 2010:
51 = ($1,690 billion / real GDP ) x 100
5,100 = $1,690 billion / real GDP
real GDP = $0.331 billion
To calculate the real gain between real GDP from year 2000 to year 2010, we divide real GDP 2010 over real GDP 2000 and subtract 1:
($0.331 billion / $0.28 billion) -1 = 0.1834 x 100% = 18.34%
Answer:
The price of the product is $59
Explanation:
Contribution margin is the net of the selling price and variable cost per unit. Contribution margin ratio is the ratio of contribution per unit to selling price per unit. As given below
Contribution margin ratio = Contribution margin per unit / Selling price per unit
23% = $13.57 / Selling price per unit
Selling price per unit = $13.57 / 23% = $59
Answer:
The amount of consolidated net income that will be assigned to the controlling interest for 2018 is $ 48,000.
Explanation:
In order to calculate consolidated net income profit and loss on intra group transactions are eliminated or not taken into account. So in order to calculate profit cost incurred by group is taken as cost of good sold and sales that is made to third party will be taken as revenue. Detail calculations are given below.
Revenue $ 100,000
COGS ($ 40,000) (50,000 *80%)
Profit $ 60,000-A
Consolidated net income controlling interest = A * 80% = $ 48,000
Answer:
- I think Ben should encourage the Senior Management to call a multidisciplynary meeting and do some research.
Explanation:
<em>I think Ben is right</em>. Even though the statement is technically correct, it may mislead customers.
Customers may interpret the phrase "<em>no sugar added</em>" as if the product did not contain any sugar.
Thus, customers interested in drinking beverages without sugar at all might think they are "safe" consuming the smoothie beverage, when in reallity each <em>smoothie's bottle contains sugar 35 g of naturally occurring sugars from the fruit.</em>
Customers deserve to be certain on what they are buying, thus the labels must be a sincere help for them, and not ambiguos at all.
This is a "gray zone" and an example of what in ethics is called a dilema.
I think the decision should be shared by a wider team and based on some research.
I think Ben should encourage the Senior Management to call a multidisciplynary meeting, where the subject is widely discussed. Also, I would suggest Ben to do some research, look for precedents about labeling in the industry, and try to learn the opinion of the FDA about this sensitive matter.
