Michael would argue that Ramses the Second died of causes that are not to be known as it is impossible to figure them out.
Explanation:
Bruno Latour is known for his work in the studies in the filed of science and technology studies. However, his study of the practice of science was indeed at one time associated with the post truth and social constructionist movements and approaches.
Michael to take a constructionist stance would be to assume that it is impossible for such a statement to be made regarding an ancient King on the basis of meager evidence for his tuberculosis.
So he would insist that it cannot be known how he died.
Brahmanism is a religion of transition between the Vedic religion (completed around the 6th century BC) and the Hindu religion (which began around the third century AD).
According to other authors, Brahmanism (or Brahmanical religion) is the same as Vedicism (or Vedic religion).
Maybe since the 4th century BC C. began to know the Upanishad, which were stories (written by Brahmins) where a Brahmin teacher taught his disciple about a unique God who was superior to the Vedic gods. They preferred meditation to opulent animal sacrifices and the ritual consumption of the soma psychotropic drug.
The Brahmins became the sole repositories of knowledge about the unique Brahman (the formless Divine, generator of all gods). There were no longer Chatrías who had spiritual knowledge, but had to become disciples of a Brahmin at some point in their lives.
From the third century or II a. C. they began to recite everywhere the extensive poems Majábharata and Ramaiana as well as the doctrinal treatises (agamas) of the different dárshanas (religious schools) that constitute a body of knowledge that has endured throughout history and has more than 280 million faithful.
Answer is B they make-up all matter
ᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟ
<span>ᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟᅟ</span>
C) a
framework or context from which to view the meaning of the change
<span>
According to symbolic
interactionists, the deciding factor that determines if change in society is
good or bad requires a
framework or context from which to view the meaning of the change.
Symbolic interactionist are sociologist that study and investigate analyzing
people on how they describe and define themselves and their peers which
influences and has various impacts on their social dealings and engagement. </span>