1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
suter [353]
3 years ago
11

Import restrictions due to the imposition of tariffs by the U.S. government will ultimately cause inefficient resource allocatio

n in the United States. will lead to lower incomes in the economy of U.S. trade partners. will lead to a decline in the quantity of the product consumed in the United States. all of the above are likely to occur
Business
1 answer:
kumpel [21]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

all of the above are likely to occur

Explanation:

Import restrictions would limit the amount of goods imported into the US

as a result of the restriction, the amount of goods sold to the US by its trade partners would fall, as a result, the income of US trade partners would reduce.

Also, the quantity of goods available in the US would fall and consumption would fall.

Import restrictions might lead to US producing goods and services for ehuch it has no comparative advantage in its production. This would lead to ineeficent allocation of resources.

You might be interested in
Sunland Company manufactures and sells high-priced motorcycles. The Engine Division produces and sells engines to other motorcyc
Andreyy89

Important dsiclamer: there was a type in the question you enter 26,000 while in the textbook is for 20,000

Answer:

a. Decrease $1,200,000

Explanation:

Income before internal transfer:

revenue 3150

cost        1050

gross     2100

fixed      (2100)

operating     0

external engine purchase (3000)

net (3000)

After internal change:

revenue 1050

cost       (960)

gross profit  90

fixed     (2100)

operating (2010)

internal engine purchase (1,050)

net    (3,060)

difference -3060--3000 = 60

20,000 units x 60 = 1,200,000

8 0
3 years ago
If the United States could produce five televisions per hour of labor and China could produce three televisions per hour of labo
IRISSAK [1]

Answer:

US specialisation in TV can be stated on the basis of Absolute Advantage, not comparative advantage.

Explanation:

Absolute Advantage is when a country can produce more output per input of a commodity, than other country.

Comparative Advantage is when a country can produce a good at lower opportunity cost (in terms of other sacrifised)

China can produce more (ie 5 units television) per hour employed, compared to US able to produce lesser (3 units) in the same time. So, on the basis of Absolute Advantage, it can be stated that US should specialise in TV production.

However, since other good's details have not been given. So, we cannot attain the relative opportunity costs. Hence, specialisation on the basis of comparative advantage can't be stated.

7 0
2 years ago
Businesses that engage in ultrahazardous activities are strictly liable for any injuries.
3241004551 [841]
I think the answer is true.
7 0
3 years ago
On January 1, 2019, Marigold Corp. Had the following stockholders' equity accounts.
Temka [501]

a. The preparation of the stockholders' equity section of the balance sheet at December 31 foro Marigold Corp. is as follows:

<h3>Stockholders' Equity Section:</h3>

Marigold Corporation

<h3>Balance Sheet</h3>

At December 31, 2019

Common Stock ($5 par value)

186,560 shares issued and outstanding                       $932,800

Paid-in Capital in Excess of Par Value-Common Stock  268,880

Retained Earnings                                                             446,408

Total equity                                                                  $1,648,088

b. The payout ratio and return on common stockholders' equity are as follows:

Payout ratio = Cash Dividends/Net Income

= 94% ($206,912/$220,000 x 100)

Return on Common Stockholders' Equity = Net Income/Beginniing Outstanding Equity

= 13.5% ($220,000/$1,635,000 x 100)

<h3>Data and Analysis:</h3>

Common Stock ($10 par value)

84,800 shares issued and outstanding                       $848,000

Paid-in Capital in Excess of Par Value-Common Stock 218,000

Retained Earnings                                                           569,000

Total equity                                                                $1,635,000

Jan. 15 Retained Earnings $94,976 (84,800 x $1.12) Cash Dividends Payable $94,976

Feb. 15 Dividends Payable $94,976 Cash $94,976

Apr. 15 Retained Earnings $135,680 Stock Dividends Payable $135,680 ($16 x 84,800 x 10%)

May 15 Stock Dividends Payable $135,680 Common Stock $84,800 Paid-in Capital in Excess of Par Value $50,880

July 1 Common Stock increased to 186,560 at $5 each (84,800 + 8,480 x 2)

Dec. 1  Retained Earnings $111,936 (186,560 x $0.60) Cash Dividends Payable $111,936
Dec. 31 Net income for the year = $220,000

<h3>Retained Earnings:</h3>

Beginning balance         $569,000

Net Income                       220,000

Dividends:

Jan. 15 Cash Dividends    (94,976)

Apr. 15 Stock Dividends (135,680)

Dec. 1  Cash Dividends    (111,936)

Ending balance             $446,408

Learn more about the stockholders' equity section at brainly.com/question/13373888

#SPJ1

3 0
2 years ago
The price of good X increases from $55 to $60, and quantity demanded decreases from 500 to 400. The price of good Y increases fr
nikklg [1K]

Answer:

demand curve for Good X is more elastic than the demand curve for Good Y

Demand for good X is elastic because the coefficient of elasticity is greater than 1.

Demand for good Y is inelastic because the coefficient of elasticity is less than 1.

consumers who buy Good Y are less sensitive to price changes than consumers who buy Good X

Explanation:

Price elasticity of demand measures the responsiveness of quantity demanded to changes in price of the good.

Price elasticity of demand = percentage change in quantity demanded / percentage change in price

If the absolute value of price elasticity is greater than one, it means demand is elastic. Elastic demand means that quantity demanded is sensitive to price changes.  

Demand is inelastic if a small change in price has little or no effect on quantity demanded. The absolute value of elasticity would be less than one

Demand is unit elastic if a small change in price has an equal and proportionate effect on quantity demanded.  

For good X,

Percentage change in price = $55 / $60 - 1 = | -0.0833| = 8.33%

Percentage change in quantity demanded = 500 / 400 - 1 = 0.25 = 25%

Elasticity of demand = 25% / 8.33% = 3

Demand for good X is elastic because the coefficient of elasticity is greater than 1.

For good Y,

Percentage change in price = $55 / $60 - 1 = | -0.0833| = 8.33%

Percentage change in quantity demanded = 500 / 475 - 1 = 0.0526 = 5.26%

Elasticity of demand = 5.26% / 8.33% = 0.63

Demand for good Y is inelastic because the coefficient of elasticity is less than 1.

consumers who buy Good Y are less sensitive to price changes than consumers who buy Good X

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Domain name extensions occur _____ the period in the domain name.
    5·2 answers
  • Initially, Rhett believed he should maintain his production facilities within the United States and simply export his designer e
    5·1 answer
  • Suppose that the Federal Reserve wants to target a higher interest rate, the Federal Reserve would then:
    6·1 answer
  • What takes place during pre-planning?
    8·1 answer
  • The following information is available for the first month of operations of Lane Inc., a manufacturer of mechanical pencils:
    8·1 answer
  • Why are sales so important? please describe in details
    12·1 answer
  • A manufacturer produces 500,000 MP3 players in the first quarter of the year. It sells 400,000 of them and adds 100,000 of them
    5·1 answer
  • What does the price elasticity of supply measure? Click or tap a choice to answer the question. how income affects spending the
    12·1 answer
  • What is the APR on a loan with an effective annual rate of 15.26% and weekly compounding of interest?
    9·1 answer
  • Felix, a single taxpayer, claimed $180 of state tax as an itemized deduction on his 2018 tax return. The total itemized deductio
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!