u are talking a about the bible:
Answer:
It showed who was for or against Darwin's theories
Explanation:
Darwinism divided the public into two clear beliefs according to origin. Like this:
Those of urban origin were more inclined to assimilate Darwin's theories, evolution and adaptations of species to the environment.
Those of rural origin manifested an firm belief in the Bible and in Christian principles, rejecting any evolutionary theory.
Andrew Jackson was a strict constructionist. This means that he had a strict interpretation of the United States Constitution, as opposed to a loose constructionist who had a loose interpretation of the United States Constitution. He believed that it should not be up for interpretation and should be interpreted how it is stated.
The Bank of the United States was quite a controversial topic during this time, as strict constructionists thought it was against the United States Constitution since there was nowhere in it that stated the bank could be created. On the other hand, loose constructionists did not think having a bank was unconstitutional because it was "<em>necessary and proper</em>." They would continue to use this Necessary and Proper Clause or the "<em>elastic clause</em>" to push for things that were not explicitly stated in the Constitution.
Answer:
C) It marked a turning point away from liberal reform.
Explanation:
On edge 2020. Got it right!
They modeled their clan's organization on that of the church.
They helped church leaders maintain control of Europe.
They converted to Christianity and established ties to the church.
They rose to power in Rome, just as the church did.