Matters which time you talking about because he lead a lot of revolutions but one was over throwing batista another one was getting jailed and another becoming leader
I would say all of above but that is my opinion
Aurangzeb (Actual name Muhi-ud-Din Muhammad) and Babur (Actual name is Zahir ud Din Muhammad Babur) were both great rulers of India and belonged to Mughal family.
They both were ruling almost all of the Indian sub-continent and were in their respective times most powerful kings.
Aurangzeb’s personality in the history is a controversial one, some claim that he lacked religious tolerance as opposed to Babur and destroyed Hindu temples while others claim that he actually built many temples and inducted many Hindus in his empire which was also true of Babur who brought many Hindu dignities into his court and honored them.
Babur is considered a good ruler when it comes to foreign relations which left a mark on the empire even after his death while Aurangzeb’s rule actually brought the onset of the downfall of Mughal empire (Some blame it to his religious intolerance)
Answer:
They blazed a trail to the west coast with the help of a native Indian named Sacagawea
Explanation:
The first true phonetic alphabet (as opposed to pictograms and syllable systems) was invented by a group generally referred to by scholars, with admirable academic caution, as "Northern Semitic". They seem to have done it almost by accident. They are very familiar with Egyptian hieroglyphs (i.e. pictograms) but they assign speech sounds rather than full words to each symbol. The alphabet they used was not identical to that used by the Phoenicians, nor is it the same as that used later, and still is today, for Hebrew. But, as strange as it may sound, all known phonetic alphabets can be traced back to their origins. It seemed that this was the kind of discovery that couldn't happen a second time because it spread so quickly after the first. (I've heard the same thing about fire and the wheel, but I haven't tried to verify it. It makes sense.) "Northern Semitic" obviously spoke Semitic. They were clearly not Egyptian, but were very familiar with Egyptian culture. Were they ever slaves in Egypt? I can't imagine any way to prove or disprove that idea. Did they also give the Bible to the world? Again, the idea is interesting but not provable.
------------------------------------------