I think the correct answer would be <span>fear can motivate one toward action. It would not motivate one rather it oftentimes discourages someone in making an action. However, there are people who choose to fight over their fear. Hope this helps.</span>
The answer that fills the blank is <span>Emotional Dissonance.
Emotional dissonance is a king of organizational behavior whereby e</span>mployees, in order to conform to display rules, <span>have to express one emotion in their place of work or line of duty, although they are experiencing another emotion entirely.</span>
Standing committee consider bills and issues and recommend measures for consideration by their respective chambers.
For example, the Appropriations Committees recommend legislation to provide budget authority for federal agencies and programs.
This exemplifies the "racial identity" strategy for coping with racism.
People with a solid feeling of their racial self are truly agreeable in their skin and therefore encounter less mental injury from introduction to racism. Such people are likewise more inclined to look for "group and additionally legitimate assets" in going up against bigotry, and also talk straightforwardly to those propagating racial persecution.
Group of answer choices a small group of individuals exercises power but remains constitutionally responsible to the public non-democratic.
a small group of individuals exercises power over the state without being constitutionally responsible to the public
- This section first explains why a more thorough typology is required rather than a simple binary classification before outlining various nondemocratic regime types. Although it does not attempt to assess the relative efficacy of each type of regime discussed—doing so would necessitate a book unto itself—it does conclude with a sobering reminder of the numerous atrocities done by nondemocratic regimes that should never be overlooked.
- The goal of legitimization is to win the populace's active permission, compliance with the regime's regulations, passive obedience, toleration, or resignation. Legitimation presents at least two significant obstacles for the study of non-democratic regimes. The first criticism is that legitimation is only "window decoration." Accordingly, the autocracies' attempts to legitimize themselves lack substance since they are merely outward manifestations of the violence, coercion, or co-optation the regime is able to wield. Second, it is frequently asserted that the conceptual and methodological challenges involved in its analysis are insurmountable, even though it is widely acknowledged that legitimation is crucial to the continuation of non-democratic government. Understanding the goals, motivations, and consequences of non-democratic regimes makes these obstacles crucial to overcome Having stable legitimacy can shed light on several facets of autocratic rule.
To learn more about nondemocratic visit:brainly.com/question/474018
#SPJ4
