1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ghella [55]
4 years ago
12

Why is Walter Mitty upset about having someone else take the chains off his car

English
2 answers:
nasty-shy [4]4 years ago
6 0

He's embarrassed that he can't take the chains off his car himself. That's why he is upset.

Scilla [17]4 years ago
4 0

Walter Mitty upset about having someone else take the chains off his car because he was embarrassed he can't do it himself.

good luck

You might be interested in
THE TONYA HARDING AND NANCY KERRIGAN SCANDAL (common lit) I need helppp!
kipiarov [429]

Answer:

I think it is C

Explanation:

because the article is talking about how this event changed their lives whether Harding did do it or not she was banned and Kerrigan had to suffer that leg injury and not be able to play in the Olympics after someone attacked her.

8 0
3 years ago
Why shouldn't you break the rules ?
oee [108]
You can never know you could of done something bad
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The condition of lacking or losing something that is needed or desired
Natasha2012 [34]

Lack, want, need, require as verbs all stress the absence of something desirable, important, or necessary. Lack means to be without or to have less than a desirable quantity of something: to lack courage, sufficient money, enough

7 0
3 years ago
Which conclusion about pau amma does the excerpt support
laila [671]

Answer:

The conclusion about Pau Amma that this excerpt support is that "he thinks he is better than other animals".

8 0
3 years ago
Which logical fallacy is most clearly used in the following sentence?
steposvetlana [31]

The answer is B: ad hominem.

A logical fallacy is a failed form of argument that reaches a conclusion by means of invalid proofs that are not justified. Ad hominem (which could be translated as “against the man”) is one such logical fallacy and it involves an argument based on a direct attack of a person´s character or circumstances when they are not related to the content of the argument itself.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which statement best summarizes the following portion of the Declaration of
    9·2 answers
  • if u like journaling like me with colors and all that why do u think u like it and why do u do it i need someone to tell me :)
    14·2 answers
  • PART A: Which of the following identifies George Takei’s main claim in the text? A While America’s democracy is imperfect, the i
    9·1 answer
  • Open your shoes outside in passive voice
    11·1 answer
  • The root is to be pulled out-
    12·1 answer
  • How to promote the importance of reading for the learners?
    7·1 answer
  • What can you infer from these sentences from the story?
    7·1 answer
  • The wrestler lost the fight because his opponent proved too/very strong for him​
    12·1 answer
  • According to Miranda in the woman’s 19th century, how did her relationship with her father shape her character?
    13·1 answer
  • How have initiatives been used in Arizona in the past? Check all that apply.
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!