Answer:
Individual answer to parts are given :
a. At equilibrium,
Qs=Qd
4P-80=100-2P
6P=180
P*=30
Q*= 4*30-80= 40
<u>Equilibrium price=$30
</u>
<u>Equilibrium Quantity= 40
</u>
b. Consumer surplus=0.5(50-30)(40)= $400
Producer surplus=0.5(30-20)(40)= $200
Total surplus= $400+$200=<u>$600
</u>
c. Elasticity of demand at P=30 & Q=40, Ed= -2*(30/40)= -1.5
Elasticity of supply at P=30 & Q=40, Es= 4*(30/40)= 3
<u>Demand is More inelastic than supply. So consumers will have more burden in case of prohibition of vegetables.</u>
Answer:
sustainable competitive advantage
Explanation:
Sustainable competitive advantage refers to the abilities of a company that allows the company or firm to outperform its competitors and provide a superior or favorable long term position over competitors.
It allows the firm to have better sales, more profit margin, more customers and a larger market share than its competitors in the same industry
Answer:
Explanation:
Issue: Will the court rule in support of Daniel’s argument that Nintendo breached the warranty based on reasonable expectation on the performance of an expensive system and statements made while selling the gaming system?
Rule: There is a creation of express warranty when a seller makes a description of the statement quality, condition or performance of goods sold. This warranty is created by the statement of facts and if the seller uses words to designate the value of the supposed goods, it will only be considered as an opinion that does not create any express warranty.
The customer’s reasonable expectation of the existence of the gaming system based on the price leads to implied warranty. The goods sold should be logically fit for the general purpose for which it is sold. It should be of proper quality to satisfy the implied warranty of merchantability and the goods should fit the particular purpose for which the buyer will use the goods to satisfy the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose.
Analysis: Here, the argument of Daniel that Nintendo’s description of the gaming system as “most reliable”, and “durable” asserted that the quality and performance of the gaming system will not stay because these words create general statements that are made as part of sale or seller’s opinion about the goods. These words would be considered as puffery and do not create any express warranty. The higher price of the gaming system would create an implied warranty about the performance of the system, but the switch failed only after the warranty period. When the seller has expressly stated the warranty period as one year, any defects that occur after the warranty period will not breach the implied warranty.
Moreover, the gaming system was reasonably fit for Daniel’s business purpose and worked well during the warranty period. Hence Daniel’s arguments will not stay in front of the court.
Conclusion: The court will not rule in favor of Daniel and Daniel will not be able to recover against Nintendo because no breach of warranty had occurred.
Answer:Please refer to the explanation section
Explanation:
the question is incomplete the question does not specify how much profit is required, we will modify the question and add a $20000 as a required profit level, the new modified version of the question is "how many of the new beverage containers must be sold each month to make a monthly profit of $20000?"
existing production Plant (16000)
Variable costs = $1.25
fixed costs = $14400
selling price $3
Profit from 16000 units = (16000 x 3) - $14400 - (16000 x 1.25)
Profit from 16000 units = 48000 - 14400 - 20000 = 13600
Profits from first Plant = $13600
Profits from production facility must be $6400 ($20000 - $13600).
Let the number of new units of beverages be x
new fixed cost = $1000
new variable costs = 1.40
3X - (1000 + 1.40X) = 6400
3X -1000 - 1.6X = 6400
1.6X = 6400 + 1000
X = 7400/1.6 = 4750
4750 New units must be sold to make a profit of $2000. total units 16000 + 4750 = 20750 units
The statement, "According to an SEC investigation, Computer Associates, one of the world's largest software companies, backdated contracts to boost the company's reported revenues. This is not prescribed as an ethical business practice." is True
.
Option a
<u>
Explanation:
</u>
To thrive in the competitive world of business one has to have ethics in doing business. By doing ethical practices in the business it will boost the image of the company before the customer and it will be helpful for them to compete in the market.
From the above statement even though it is the world's largest software company it has backdated the projects contracts period to show better performance in the revenues.
Even though the project are genuine but the moral responsibility in reporting revenues to the investors take taken a dent by doing an unethical thing.