Answer:
The reason is Charlie chooses the sample which does not requires hard work to extract useful data and other factors were not considered like babies are always part of household size.
Explanation:
The approach was to just completing the task not completing the task with the level of research which it requires. The sample chosen was very small and was not representative of the population. The reason is that the students in the stats class might be from same housing society where millionaires reside. So the sample is inappropriate here because the way a rich people spend his life is different from the labors, etc. So the household matters on the financial status of person, culture, etc. The sample chosen a very small share which was not a random selection.
Secondly, Charlie must consider the age of person that the person is financially responsible to take care of. Because babies are always in the household size and that this information was also not considered necessary by Charlie to extract.
Answer:
Hidden agendas are goals that are not immediately obvious but influence how an author presents the facts.
At least 970,000 veterans hope this helps
Answer:
C. applied unequally across states.
Explanation:
The case of Furman V. Georgia occured in 1972. At that time, most states did not necessarily 'Banned' the use of death penalty as a punishment. But the problems occurred because it seems that each states have different standard when determining which type of criminals should be sentenced with death penalty.
Example of the unequal application :
Furman was sentenced to death penalty because he killed someone during an attempted robbery. But criminals who convicted with the same charge in California at that time was punished with 25 years of prison time. Not death penalty.
