Answer:
A) The first is a prediction about a recommendation the main argument opposes; the second is a conclusion drawn in order to support the main conclusion.
Explanation:
From the argument above by the two senators, it could be seen that the two Senators are argueing in favour and argainst the Tax. Senator Baker, was of the believe that his opponent, Senator Rothmore calling for increase in taxes to fund programs helps the long-term unemployed.
His argument was based soley on the unemployed without factoring in the small businesses that would be killed off as a result of the tax increment. The fall of small businesses would definitely affect the prediction he made about unemployed getting work. This is because, those unemployed can only work by the opportunities created by the small businesses.
Senator Baker only made the second conclusion inorder to support his argument on the need to lower taxes which would drive job creations thereby being a win-win situation for both the government and the citizens.
D. Dynasty. The reason is that a dynasty can have a ruler place his son (or daughter) on the throne, keeping the legacy on.
The answer is:
They will serve in the military when required.
They will support and defend the US Constitution.
They will show allegiance to the nation's laws
Basically, all naturalized US citizens are required to upheld the same obligations like the citizens that born in united states. Voting in election and volunteering in political campaigns are considered to be the right/freedom of the citizens, not the obligation. You would not face legal punishments if you choose to avoid your rights, but you could face it if you avoid your obligations.
Where any male age 18 and over was drafted into the military,
B. Legislative
Explanation: The legislative branch contains the congress and other lawmakers in the government
