When we look back in the past of Chilean literature, Manuel Rojas, started his writing career in between the naturalist movement. To understand more, we can relate realism and naturalism. First, naturalists' writing involved an extreme portrayal of realism which focused more on barbaric attributes of the human race. And then, the characters included in such stories belonged to the bottom of the society, with an unsavory description.
We notice a non-participant narrator in this tale of kindness. He's a third-person narrator who is limited to the visuals and physical activities of the characters but has no access to their thoughts. However, he describes the mentality of the young boy. This effect is created to focus more on the conditions and their impact, on the miserable life.
Through this, it is easy to infer that the third choice would get you the best marks. 
=> The use of third-person limited point of view allows the reader to better understand the main character.
 
        
                    
             
        
        
        
Answer:
by the stock of superlatives the author means the group of people who were superlative or of high post or standard in the audience.
And the sentence means that the person exhausted or astonished the minds of his audience that even the superlatives were surprised by his lecture and was....as said the first after Desmond Tutu in 2008 to get a standing ovation or the highest standard of applause to him.
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
Smoothly, swiftly, into place with a poet’s
Quick skill, singing his new song aloud
While he shaped it, and the old songs as well. . . .”
Explanation:
 
        
             
        
        
        
This is for a book I'm writing about two friends, and I need 1 thing young people need more credit for, 1 thing they need less credit for, 1 thing adults need more credit for, and 1 thing they need less credit for. If books get published, I will thank you for help!
 
        
                    
             
        
        
        
Answer:
                        THE COUNTRY I WOULD NOT TRAVEL TO
I am the kind of person that dislikes cold weather and extreme cold weather is a no no for me because i would not survive two days in such a place even with the best heaters and protective clothing available.
That being said, the country i would not travel to is Russia because of its extreme weather conditions. Places like Verkhoyansk and Oymyakon in the Sakha Republic have recorded freezing cold temperature of −67.8 °C (−90.0 °F). 
I cannot even begin to imagine how bone knocking and gut wrenching it would be for me so travelling to Russia is not really an option for me unless it is absolutely necessary.