1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Charra [1.4K]
3 years ago
10

8. Explain the differences between a country with an absolute monarchy versus one that is a constitutional monarchy? In a transi

tion from an absolute monarchy to a constitutional monarchy, who is gaining more power or representation? 9. What was the role of disease in the Americas and Pacific islands? Did it help or hold back European expansion in these areas? Why?
History
1 answer:
inessss [21]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

<h3>country with an absolute monarchy would have no democratic values while in a country with constitutional monarchy, the power would be shared within the monarchy and the people.</h3><h3 />

Explanation:

A country with an absolute monarchy would have no democratic values as the overall power would be in the hands of a monarchy. Such countries would be governed by a single person and all citizens would be a subject to the king/queen.

On the other hand, a country with constitutional monarchy would have a monarchical system but the monarchy would exercise its power in accordance to the constitution. The monarchy is not sovereign and the power would be shared within the monarchy and the people.

In a transition from an absolute monarchy to a constitutional monarchy, <u>the common people</u> are gaining more power or representation.

The diseases in the Americas and Pacific Island <u>devastated the lives of the isolated native people. It dislocated and destroyed their social systems as they had no cure or immunity to diseases from the outside world</u>.

It did not hold back European expansion in these areas because <u>most Europeans were immune to such diseases. Instead, it gave an advantage to the colonists from Europe to easily defeat the ailing natives.</u>

You might be interested in
According to this image what do Chinese junk appear to be made out of
Misha Larkins [42]
Wood is the best possible answer
8 0
3 years ago
How did the caltholic church respond to the Protestant reformation
11111nata11111 [884]

Answer:

Counter-Reformation, also called Catholic Reformation or Catholic Revival, in the history of Christianity, the Roman Catholic efforts directed in the 16th and early 17th centuries both against the Protestant Reformation and toward internal renewal. The Counter-Reformation took place during roughly the same period as the Protestant Reformation, actually (according to some sources) beginning shortly before Martin Luther’s act of nailing the Ninety-five Theses to the door of Castle Church in 1517.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
How were the Navigation Acts an application of England’s use of mercantilism?
madreJ [45]

Answer:

Dndnnd

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
What symbol speech? How. Can an action be considered speech
Harman [31]

Europeans call the French and Indian War the Seven Years War

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Question: Evaluate the extent to which European and East Asian state development differed in the
denpristay [2]

Answer:

In the 1200s, the way both European and East Asian society is pretty much the same. They both believed in the idea that there were a certain bloodline that must be obeyed  the rest of the people and will be granted with the right to rule over them. There were basically no punishment for nobles who violate the rights of the commoners.

Even the way they operate their military is similar. They teach the value of 'Honor' to the soldiers as a basic principle in order to make them not afraid to sacrifice their lives in the battle field.

Between 1300 - 1600, European nations entered the renaissance period. The previous belief which made people think that nobles have the right to rule over everything were gradually changing. They started to developed the idea that the government should exist to protect the people, not the other way around. This was when the idea of democratic government started to expanded across Europe.

On the other hand, this idea just became popular in East Asia in mid 1500s. They also didn't get as much momentum as the one in Europe. As a result, East  still adopted a very constricted view on human rights within this period and Government role's to protect it. Even in mid 1900s, japan still joined forces with the Nazi because they believed that they are destined to rule over Asia.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Was Hitler's power in Europe was seriously checked when the United States entered the war.
    15·1 answer
  • Fill in the blank with the correct
    10·1 answer
  • Negative consequences on building a civilization
    6·2 answers
  • Was Adolf Hitler’s mom a Jew ?
    10·1 answer
  • What was the effect of the 14th Amendment?
    5·2 answers
  • 4.) True or False: Richard Nixon was elected to represent the state of California as both a U.S. House
    15·1 answer
  • What industry began to learn are americans into far west during the first part of the 19th century?
    10·1 answer
  • Why did portugal have control of brazil as a colony
    8·1 answer
  • 1. How did the Nez Perce delegation to William Clark affect westward settlement?
    7·1 answer
  • Explain ONE way in which this passage reflected the context regarding the superpowers in which the Non-Aligned Movement was form
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!