1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tiny-mole [99]
3 years ago
5

Why is education the main responsibility of state government?

History
1 answer:
MariettaO [177]3 years ago
7 0

Answer: Because without education people wouldn’t be able to learn how to do important jobs. Even simple things such as reading and writing are very important to the future of an economy. The future without education would be less jobs, which would equal less money, which would even out as a poorer economy.

Just my opinion though.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
John Locke thiught people were neither good nor bad naturally.How did Hobbes views differ from lockes
ruslelena [56]

Answer:  Hobbes believed people were naturally selfish and violent.

<u>Further explanation</u>:

Both English philosophers believed there is a "social contract" -- that governments are formed by the will of the people.  But their theories on why people want to live under governments were very different.

Thomas Hobbes published his political theory in <em>Leviathan </em> in 1651, following the chaos and destruction of the English Civil War.  He saw human beings as naturally suspicious of one another, in competition with each other, and evil toward one another as a result.  Forming a government meant giving up personal liberty, but gaining security against what would otherwise be a situation of every person at war with every other person.

John Locke published his <em>Two Treatises on Civil Government </em>in 1690, following the mostly peaceful transition of government power that was the Glorious Revolution in England.  Locke believed people are born as blank slates--with no preexisting knowledge or moral leanings.  Experience then guides them to the knowledge and the best form of life, and they choose to form governments to make life and society better.

In teaching the difference between Hobbes and Locke, I've often put it this way.  If society were playground basketball, Hobbes believed you must have a referee who sets and enforces rules, or else the players will eventually get into heated arguments and bloody fights with one another, because people get nasty in competition that way.   Locke believed you could have an enjoyable game of playground basketball without a referee, but a referee makes the game better because then any disputes that come up between players have a fair way of being resolved.    Of course, Hobbes and Locke never actually wrote about basketball -- a game not invented until 1891 in America by James Naismith.  But it's just an illustration I've used to try to show the difference of ideas between Hobbes and Locke.   :-)

5 0
3 years ago
How did the British come to occupy Egypt?
Lena [83]
If im corect  its C and im pretty sur im correct


4 0
3 years ago
Given hobbes' view of nature how might a government organize itself against such tendencies
Ghella [55]
Nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
7 0
3 years ago
How was the Iroquois League's 16th-century territorial expansion similar to
devlian [24]

Answer:

C. Both expansions forced many American Indian tribes to migrate

from their ancestral territories.

Explanation:

There was about 562 Native American Indian tribes which were spread all over the continent of North America. They are known as the original inhabitants of North America. The Iroquois league were also present and were found in what is today called New York.

The Iroquois League's 16th-century territorial expansion similar to the spread of early European colonies in North America in that both expansions forced many American Indian tribes to migrate

from their ancestral territories.

6 0
3 years ago
What caused many people in the urban middle class to oppose Diaz's dictatorship and support a political revolution?
r-ruslan [8.4K]

Porfirio Diaz was president of Mexico from 1884 to 1911, This was a time of great economic growth for Mexico, as the regime opened its doors to foreign investment, particularly in the mining sector. However, Diaz's policies promoted a strong centralized government, which would lead to an unequal focus on certain regions and economic activities of the country, leaving others exposed to impoverishment. The expropriation of peasants lands in favor of big enterprises enraged rural populations. Inequality among the regions and societies of urbanized areas was becoming more evident. This led to a series of manifestations against the government that would eventually lead to the end of the regime.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • (10 POINTS)can someone please describe 3 or more provisions of the Clayton Antitrust Act.
    9·1 answer
  • Which two innovations are usually attributed to the Hittites?
    7·2 answers
  • 19. Which of the following is not true:
    6·1 answer
  • 1. A provision of the Supreme Court ruling on the Scott v. Sandford case was later overturned by
    11·1 answer
  • Help asap will give BRAINLIEST
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following best describes the government in Spanish colonies?
    8·1 answer
  • Which describes an effect of Prohibition?
    12·2 answers
  • How did the Louisiana Purchase change the United States?
    14·1 answer
  • The U.S. Constitution gives citizens the right to vote for the president. This is
    13·2 answers
  • Which European country has the largest land area in the world? *
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!