2. Jane Jackson purchased a sealed can of Katydids, chocolate-covered pecan caramel candies manufactured by Nestle. Shortly afte
r, Jackson bit into one of the candies and allegedly broke a tooth on a pecan shell embedded in the candy. She filed a complaint, asserting breach of implied warranty. How would you argue on behalf of the company?
The argument for the company would be based on the fact that, she could have had a defective tooth which only broke while eating the Katydids candies.<em> Most times, the warranty offered in food is with regards to the food being expired, unwholesome for eating due to foreign materials inside etc.</em>
<em>Her filing for breach of warranty over her defective tooth is uncalled for.</em>
