The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Yes, indeed, President Lyndon Johnson supported social programs to improve the United States. One program that he supported was VASTA, and it helped citizens in the following way.
The Great Society program under Lyndon Johnson which was the domestic equivalent of John Kennedy's Peace Corps was AmeriCorps VISTA.
As part of his promise of combating poverty in America, President Lyndon B. Jhonson signed the Economic Opportunity Act in 1964, which was compared to the US version of the Peace Corps created by former President John F. Kennedy. The goal was to open more jobs as part of Johnson's "War of Poverty in America."
The goal of this series of programs and pieces of legislation was to end poverty in America, reduce the inequality in American society, reduce crime, and support environmental actions. He coined the term "Great Society" during a speech at the University of Michigan, in Ann Arbor.
Some ofthose harmful effects are:
-It makes us refuse to acknowledge other truth beside our religion. This could make us overlook scientific evidence because we're too afraid to become a sinner according to our religion
- If religious enthusiasm exist between two different groups of religion, it often end up in violence in order to proof who are the one that has better beliefs
Answer:
All of them
Explanation:
The king condemning his own peaceful actions to be the cause of violence is in complete contradiction to one another. An oddity occurs and the action is in complete contrast to the outcome. One cannot justify that the corresponding actions may have led to the specific outcome. such is also the case in the example:
a; condemning a robbed man for having too much money does in no way justifies the action of robbing. Blaming a source that was done only for the reason of ones own satisfaction.
b; condemning Socrates for his truth to force people to make him drink the hemlock, is as absurd as the above example.
c; condemning Jesus for his devotion to God shows that the intention of the action was completely different but the outcome was in complete contrast.
This is an example of a Syncratic Decision
Syncratic decision making was developed by Herbst along with the other three decision making power structures (autonomic, husband dominant and wife dominant). Syncratic decision making means joint decision making by the husband and the wife.
