It left he nations with the choice to declare their independence.
Explanation:
Most of the nations of the eastern region had declared their independence from the mother state of USSR and its communist regimes right after the fall of the USSR.
This was done when they got the free choice to do so if they pleased and the majority of the states had simply opted out.
There was a sense of dissatisfaction among the people with that mode of governance and they had seen the developed of the Democratic countries and wanted it for them.
The states had thus chosen for democracy
The America's were named for the Italin explorer Amerigo Vespucci.
The answer should be C. Sugar plantations required large numbers of workers at low cost.
It depends. The true definition, with is roughly law without force, then it wouldn't be too bad. Sounds like it would just be a non corrupt world. However, modern day groups like ANTIFA, it would suck. Things have been blown out of proportion honestly to the point where anarchy, or "anti-fascism", almost looks like fascism.
"<span>C) the french were inspired to sign a truce with British like the Americans had" is incorrect. There was never a need for a treaty with America because the two countries weren't at war. </span>
