Moral diplomacy was a major tool for the United States to pursue its economic interests abroad.
In the end, moral diplomacy increased the U.S.'s direct military action in many countries and also greatly impacted the economy by manipulating situations in countries that were not democratic or those that held what Wilson viewed as morally corrupt values.
A. It encouraged expansion by granting low-cost land to settlers
Answer:
Supporters of Laissez faire believe that this type of system promotes more incentives to trade and economic growth, in addition to encouraging freedom among companies.
Supporters of economic intervention, on the other hand, believe that the intervention promotes fairer and more equitable trade and allows new companies to become as influential as old companies, which will promote economic growth.
Explanation:
Economic intervention allows the government of a country to impose limits and interference in trade and the productive sector. These limitations prevent economically strong companies from dominating an entire productive sector, promoting more commercial fairness and allowing new companies to emerge in addition to allowing small companies to grow in the same sector as large companies.
Laissez Faire, on the other hand, discredits any government intervention in trade and this imposes freedom on companies and industries, which will allow full production and vast economic growth.
In the late 1920s the European demand for agricultural and manufacturing goods from the US was declining.
Answer:
They aged over time. They got older and changed a lot, they got lots of rings. Age changed them by changing the way the logs burned and etc.
Explanation:
