The correct response is “C. Germany’s attack on Russia was
similar to betraying all the rules of civilization.”
When Joseph Stalin addressed his people during this radio
broadcast, it was to communicate that Germany had attacked Russia despite a
non-aggression act (or peace treaty).
Thus, Stalin was mentioning how Russia was betrayed by Germany. Additionally, because cannibalism is generally
seen to be innately wrong by civilized societies, Stalin alludes to how waging
war when peace was communicated as the goal is low/uncivilized and even
cannibal-like.
The correct answer is B. Making people vote will result in uneducated voters who vote randomly
Explanation:
A counterclaim is a claim or statement that rebuts or goes against a claim, in this case, the main idea of the claim proposed is that all Citizens from the United States should vote in every election, probably because an important percentage of citizens do not participate in election and the author of this considers the most important is all citizens participate. However,all citizens participating in the elections might not be that positive as this might not mean responsible participation, in this way option B "Making people vote will result in uneducated voters who vote randomly" is a counterclaim because it shows the first idea of making everybody vote has negative implication and thus it is not as valid as it seemed, as this idea rebuts the first idea it is classified as a counterclaim.
The best answer here is the last one, that he interacts easily with both his superiors and the drivers. In the excerpt, we see how the narrator is able to talk with the officers with ease and then how he goes to the drivers with that same ease.
If we look at the other answers, we can see that they don't work. The first one doesn't make much sense as the narrator shows no preference towards either set of people. The second choice makes no sense because the narrator does not ask the officers for cigarettes. The third choice also does not make sense because there is no hint of derision from the narrator to the officers or drivers.
Dbdbdbsbdbdbdbdhdgdhdhxbsbdbd dbdbdbxhdbdbzhsksbsjdbxbdbd I’m sorry
To illustrate that the list that McCandless had made was supported by actions as well as words, as shown in option D.
<h3>What is the effect of this description?</h3>
- It increases the reader's feelings about the characters' intentions.
- It optimizes the understanding of McCandess' image.
- Characterizes the characters indirectly.
When Krakauer describes McCandless's image of himself, he promotes a greater understanding of McCandless's list and shows himself as a character who likes to analyze the actions of others very accurately. It also shows that McCandless is a very proactive character who speaks and acts on his words.
This attitude is efficient to explain the characters and indirectly characterizes them.
Learn more about indirect characterization:
brainly.com/question/12003614
#SPJ1
