Answer:
The same political colour but different approaches
Explanation:
First the classic ¨liberal conservative¨ approach by Tim Huelskamp in 2012. He stated that the federal nutrional program - to confront obesity and against the liberal opinion that everybody shoud decide for themselves - for schools left many kids hungry, according to their parents. This at least makes sense because if you have your kids on a high-fat diet with lots of fast food and coke, a healthier diet all of a sudden causes unexpected problems. As anyone who did a diet can understand.
Second the more aggressive populist approach by Steve King in 1917 who counterattacked the critics on the money spend on the border wall by suggesting that the money for the wall could be taken from the Planned Parenthood program and did even go beyond that saying he´ll take money away from food stamp recipients (!) because this program has caused (!!!) obesity.
The speakers personal identification and the speaker approach to life
Answer: A) The relief provided by the Pro Walk inserts is temporary at best.
Explanation: In the given excerpt from the Pro Walk Web page, we can see a positive opinion about the product, a cashier, who spends on his feet more than eight hours a day and that had really bad pain in his feet, hips and lower back, says that the Pro Walk gives him more support and has make a big difference in his pain. The opinion that presents an opposing view is option A, because it says that the relief provided by the product is temporary at best.
