All those revolutions are or were fighting an enemy with nowhere to go. Both sides have to either win or die.
The American Revolution was against the British who lived far away and at some point found the cost of fighting across an ocean too high for the expected return and decided to stay in the comfort of their home.
<span>There is no home comfort to return to when you fight at home, so you keep fighting knowing your enemy is on the same predicament so you can't expect an easy surrender.</span>
This quote would most likely come out of a textbook that could be related to people who would support social darwinism. For that reason 3. Social Darwinism is the correct answer.
Social Darwinism talks exactly about this type of things where people and whole nations are in the struggle for survival and only the fittest ones will survive in this ongoing struggle.
Answer: D. Constitution
Explanation:
The Constitution is the largest state legal document of a state. The Constitution regulates all important issues in the country, including the structure, functioning and limitation of government activities. The Constitution is an inevitable document for the legal functioning of a democratic system. The Constitution covers all citizens without exception.
Answer:
Option: They wanted to seek silver and gold there.
Explanation:
Americans first travel across the Great Plains to get gold and silver in the 1800s. After the Civil War, a vast amount of people from the east began to move in the West in search of gold. The first wave of settlers to the West were miners. The great plains region consists of Texas, Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, and Oklahoma.
17th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution: Direct Election of U.S. Senators (1913)
The Constitution, as it was adopted in 1788, made the Senate an assembly where the states would have equal representation. Each state legislature would elect two senators to 6-year terms. Late in the 19th century, some state legislatures deadlocked over the election of a senator when different parties controlled different houses, and Senate vacancies could last months or years. In other cases, special interests or political machines gained control over the state legislature. Progressive reformers dismissed individuals elected by such legislatures as puppets and the Senate as a "millionaire’s club" serving powerful private interests.
One Progressive response to these concerns was the "Oregon system," which utilized a state primary election to identify the voters’ choice for Senator while pledging all candidates for the state legislature to honor the primary’s result. Over half of the states adopted the "Oregon system," but the 1912 Senate investigation of bribery and corruption in the election of Illinois Senator William Lorimer indicated that only a constitutional amendment mandating the direct election of Senators by a state’s citizenry would allay public demands for reform.
When the House passed proposed amendments for the direct election of Senators in 1910 and 1911, they included a "race rider" meant to bar Federal intervention in cases of racial discrimination among voters. This would be done by vesting complete control of Senate elections in state governments. A substitute amendment by Senator Joseph L. Bristow of Kansas provided for the direct election of Senators without the "race rider." It was adopted by the Senate on a close vote before the proposed constitutional amendment itself passed the Senate. Over a year later, the House accepted the change, and on April 8, 1913, the resolution became the 17th amendment.
