1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ugo [173]
3 years ago
6

PLEASE PLEASE HELP!!!!! ONLY GOT AN HOUR!!!!!

History
2 answers:
timofeeve [1]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Explanation:

This is a stupid question

Degger [83]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Answers are below

Explanation:

A. ) Italian politics during the time of the Renaissance was dominated by the rising merchant class, especially one family, The House of Medici.

B. ) Princes achieve the most success when they are crafty, cunning and able to trick others.

C. ) Machiavelli desperately wanted to return to politics.

You might be interested in
What troubles was Germany facing in the 1920s that led many people (including Adolf Hitler) to join or support the Nazi Party?
ankoles [38]

Economic - During World War 1, the German economy was completely decimated. Massive hyperinflation there is so terrible that when employees receive three daily paychecks, their spouses merely spend the money on everything they can since prices are so high. And although its economy was in ruin, Germany had to provide reparations to the people it was fighting. And to top it all off, there is the great depression.

Political - Although it is far from the truth, the Treaty of Versailles forced Germany to take full responsibility for the war. The pact also required Germany to lose a sizable portion of its territory to neighboring nations including Poland, France, Belgium, and a few others. German speakers and people of German descent populated several of these countries. It becomes worse since one of Woodrow Wilson's 14 principles called for self-determination for all nations save Germany, including Austro-Hungary, a German ally.

Social - The aforementioned political motives caused many Germans to feel exploited for other people's political objectives. So it should come as no surprise that they chose a radical candidate when you repress a people like that.

6 0
2 years ago
Which statements accurately describe the English colonies in North America? Choose all answers that are correct. A. John Rolfe t
m_a_m_a [10]
John rolfe taught the jamestown settlers how to plant and harvest tabacco which saved the colony's economy
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
American revolution, french revolution, and glorious revolution similarities
agasfer [191]

Answer:

The Glorious Revolution, the American Revolution, and the French Revolution were all rebellions against monarchs. The Revolution commenced as the the lower class of France despised the government who did nothing for them. The Glorious Revolution began similarly as they both wished to overthrow the king, but in this case, the Parliament was the main victim rather than the people. The American Revolution did lead to a democratic government, while the French revolution implemented many elements of democracy, such as universal civil and political rights.  Like the American Revolution, the Glorious Revolution involved substantial intervention by a foreign power: In the Glorious Revolution it was the Dutch, who sort of quietly invaded England, while in the American Revolution it was France which supported the American colonists.

Explanation:

(ง •_•)ง

8 0
3 years ago
The Supreme Court has placed limits on the freedom of the press. Answer the following questions about libel, slander, and prior
Serhud [2]

Answer:

There are four elements a person must establish in order to prove he or she has been defamed:

Publication,

Identification,

Harm and.

Fault.

To prove prima facie defamation, a plaintiff must show four things: 1) a false statement purporting to be fact; 2) publication or communication of that statement to a third person; 3) fault amounting to at least negligence; and 4) damages, or some harm caused to the person or entity who is the subject of the statement.

Explanation:

please mark this answer as the brainlest

5 0
3 years ago
How were the british able to conquer india?
melisa1 [442]
There are a good number of reasons why the British were able to do so, and in fact rule over India effectively for over a century.

Disunity among Indian princely states. India was more a collection of warring princely states, at loggerheads with each other. The British sucessfully used this to play off one state against another. Add to it there was no dearth of people willing to betray the kingdom for a few pieces of silver. Robert Clive succeeded at Plassey, because Mir Jaffar was willing to betray his master Siraj-Ud-Daulah in lie of being the Nawab. Mir Jaffar himself was betrayed by Mir Qasim later on.Tipu Sultan one of the most redoubtable fighters against the British rule, was finally defeated, as the Marathas, King of Mysore, Nizam of Hyderabad all joined hands with the British.
Superiority over other colonial powers. The other colonial powers in India competing for the share of resources were France,Portugal,Denmark, Holland. Of the 4, Denmark and Holland could never really be serious competitors to the British, they had their own trading posts, scattered around, but were never a serious threat. Portugal focussed primarily on the Western coast, Goa, parts of Kerala, Karnataka, and this left the British with vast swathes of unoccupied territory. That left France as the major contender to Britian in the race for colonialism. The British Army was more well equipped, more professional, more disciplined compared to the French army, suffering from indiscipline and corruption. This made the British win key battles all over the East Coast, as they effectively grabbed control.
Doctrine of Lapse. One of the most effective tactics, the British used to take over most of India. Instead of waging an all out war against some of the princely states, they signed a treaty with them, where in if the ruling king died without a heir, the East India company could take over that. And that is how Satara became one of the first states to end up under British rule. And that was also the main reason for the conflict in Jhansi.
Subsidiary alliance was also an effective instrument. According to this alliance, the kingdom which signs the treaty will have to maintain the following rules:

The British agreed to maintain a permanent and fixed subsidiary force within the territory of their ally.
In return, they didn't take money but took over a part of the territory of the ally.
A British officer called "resident" was placed at the court of the ruler.{he could interfere in the internal matters of the kingdom}
The ally could not maintain any relation with any other ruler without the approval of the British.{so,when the rulers wanted to revolt against the British they are alone.}
The Indian rulers felt a false sense of security but in reality they were losing their independence. On the other hand the Britishers maintained large forces at the expenses of the Indian rulers and also increase their area of influence. Some states brought under control through this policy are Hyderabad, Tanjore, Awadh, etc.
At the end of it all, the British had the advantage of better manpower, were militarily more powerful and stronger, and add to it they had some very canny strategists too. And the disunity among Indian princely states, their constant warring with each other, just added to the advantage.
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What investigated communism in the film industry 
    15·1 answer
  • How is the free soil party different from the know nothing party?
    5·2 answers
  • How did american indians help the patriots
    15·1 answer
  • Has Rosa Parks changed your life ? How so ?
    13·1 answer
  • Which two countries gained territories as a result of the Treaty of Paris 1763?
    10·1 answer
  • How did Cesar change the Roman senate
    13·2 answers
  • Why was 1990 an important year regarding air quality
    10·2 answers
  • Which of the following was an internationalcause of the global depression?
    14·1 answer
  • imperialism made latin america economies largely dependent on the _____ of raw materials to european countries
    7·1 answer
  • US HISTORY . SOMEONE HELP PLEASE
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!