Monopolistically competitive firms (A) cannot influence the market price by virtue of their size alone while monopolies and oligopolies can.
<h3>
What is a monopoly?</h3>
- A monopoly occurs when there is a single seller in the market.
- The monopoly case is considered the polar opposite of perfect competition in conventional economic theory.
- The demand curve facing the monopolist is, by definition, the industry demand curve, which is downward sloping.
<h3>What is
oligopoly?</h3>
- Oligopolistic markets are characterized by a small number of suppliers.
- They can be found in all nations and in a wide range of industries.
- Some oligopoly markets are very competitive, whereas others are substantially less so, or appear to be.
Monopolistically competitive enterprises, unlike monopolies and oligopolies, cannot influence market prices only through their size.
Therefore, monopolistically competitive firms (A) cannot influence the market price by virtue of their size alone while monopolies and oligopolies can.
Know more about monopoly here:
brainly.com/question/13113415
#SPJ4
Correct question:
The feature that differentiates monopolistic competition from monopolies and oligopolies is that monopolistically competitive firms.
(A) cannot influence the market price by virtue of their size alone.
(B) are price takers.
(C) do not have a price as a decision variable.
(D) benefit from barriers to entry.
Answer: See explanation
Explanation:
Economics is the study of human behavior and also how resources are allocated in the society. Economics studies the reason for the behavior in the individuals, firms or government when certain situations happen in the economy.
Opportunity cost is refered to as n alternative cost that's, the cos if what we forgo when we make an alternative decision. For example, if I purchase a book for $20, the opportunity cost is something else that I could have used the $20 for.
Answer:
increase his consumption of product Y and decrease his consumption of product X
Explanation:
Base on the scenario been described in the question, Oscar make purchase of a X product which he already has, which after consuming has a 10 utils costing him $5, he also purchase another product Y he which after consuming has 8 until costing, this suggest that Oscar reduce his consumption on X and increase his consumption on Y according to the equal marginal principle.
The equal marginal principle talks about the behavior of a consumer in sharing his available income within various goods and services. This law states that how a consumer distributes his money income within various goods to be able obtain maximum satisfaction.
Answer:
No, because they weren’t willing to risk their life to complete a task at the appliance plant. By law this is not safe working conditions and the people forcing employees to do this could be sued.
Explanation: