DONT PRESS THAT LINK IVE SEEN IT EVERYWHERE
I think the correct answer from the choices listed above is the last option. H<span>e earns a salary from his work, interest on his savings account, and dividends on his stock holdings. Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day.</span>
Answer: Congress gives too many tax breaks to corporations.
Explanation:
Normative statements are said to be statement of opinion and not fact.
Option D is therefore a normative statement because it is the opinion of the speaker that congress gives too many tax breaks because from a neutral standpoint, it cannot be said with certainty the number of tax breaks that will be considered too much.
The other options are statements of fact.
Answer:
US specialisation in TV can be stated on the basis of Absolute Advantage, not comparative advantage.
Explanation:
Absolute Advantage is when a country can produce more output per input of a commodity, than other country.
Comparative Advantage is when a country can produce a good at lower opportunity cost (in terms of other sacrifised)
China can produce more (ie 5 units television) per hour employed, compared to US able to produce lesser (3 units) in the same time. So, on the basis of Absolute Advantage, it can be stated that US should specialise in TV production.
However, since other good's details have not been given. So, we cannot attain the relative opportunity costs. Hence, specialisation on the basis of comparative advantage can't be stated.
Increased competition.
Answer: Option 3.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Free trade is the trade of goods and services from one country to the other country without any boundations and without any restrictions. As a result of the free trade, the consumers have more variety of a particular good in the market.
In this particular case, since Rooby is no longer the only producer of this particular because of the free trade in the market, he can not charge too high for a particular good and it increases the competition between the producers.
