It created a greater division between the new political party I believe
I would say that authoritarianism is prevented in this case.
Authoritarianism means that there is only one person deciding what is right or what is wrong, according to their own thoughts and ideas. Nobody else has a say in a such an organization. However, here, that is obviously not the case, which is why that is prevented when a lot of people express their own opinions.
No
Why: in the case of an a real build up of supporters for a nazi like movement in the United States would be crazy. Imagine how many regions and people suffered such as Jehovah’s Witness and Jews affected to the sum of almost 5-6 million deaths. If the USA learned from are history most likely this would not happen I rest my case XD
Answer:
The answer is D
Explanation:
The Answer is D because Terrorism usually forms as a means to combat other groups in an way that is unconventional. One of the best examples is in Yugoslavia during the 1990s in Bosnia where multiple terrorist groups in support of Bosnia formed as well as terrorist groups for Serbia due to the ethnic and religious tension within the region.
The same can be said for the Middle East with many different minorities, ethnic groups, and different Islamic Sects as well as strict Tribal Ways and Institutions.
