1) It was quite necessary not only for Buck, but also for others struggling to survive in the wild North. If he hadn't killed Spitz it it could have been very dangerous for others because he was very aggressive due to the hunger. Even though he was the leader, blinded by hunger he could do anything to survive, forgetting about the rest of dogs.
2) If he hadn't died he could have get many other innocent lives, like he had done to Curley. This character yielded to the external conflict of the harsh wild conditions, and his instings were much more powerful than his sense of justice so he could have bring harm until he reached his own safety.
Tbh idek if I would have known then I would have been the smartest person alive
Answer:
they have to realize that is something from the past and it's gone it can't be changed, they have to be with positive people and read psychological books about how to move on forward and live their life near their family and enjoy every moment
Answer: C: It makes Pyramus seem both passionate and ridiculous
Explanation: I took the test :)
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
You forgot to include the options of the question, however, we can answer the following.
A correct analysis of the sentence would be "The prepositional phrase “on the park bench” acts as adjectival phrase."
In this case, the prepositional phrase is going to modify the non that is " the kindly old man." The preposition in the sentence is "on the bench," the place where the old man is seated while feeding the pigeons with breadcrumbs.
