Answer:
The correct answer is d. Failure to support climate-change treaties.
Explanation:
An ethical dilemma is a situation in which an apparent operational conflict between two ethical imperatives is presented in such a way that obedience to one of them implies the transgression of the other. In general, it is called an ethical dilemma when an agent (the professional, in this case) has reasons to carry out two actions (or more), each of which favors a different principle, and it is not possible to fulfill them without violating any of they. In this way, the agent is in a situation in which he is condemned to commit a foul: no matter what he does, he will do something "wrong" or will miss an obligation.
Answer:
B. $6
Explanation:
Marginal revenue for the worker = change in wage ÷ change in quantity output
Change in wage = (40×$6) - (36×$6) = $240 - $216 = $24
Change in quantity output = 40 - 36 = 4
Marginal revenue for the worker = $24 ÷ 4 = $6
Both but fixed goes first so a is correct
Following are the three levels of interconnectedness that affect organizational structure:
<h3>
What is the Parsons Thompson model?</h3>
The three layers or levels of the Parson and Thompson model describe what occurs in the enterprise and how a process or activity serves a particular goal.
Here is a summary of Thompson's levels of interdependence:
- In order to create a team where each member contributes to the total, there are three types of interdependence that can be used.
In a business school, the degree of connection between the departments of finance and marketing is:
- Structure of Reciprocal Interdependence.
There are various coordination techniques that might be applied to manage the interdependence, including:
- complete cooperation
- extensive preparation
- Mutual apprehension
We must demonstrate the many layers of interconnectedness and how they might be applied in diverse systems, such as a business school's finance or marketing department, in order to answer the issue.
To learn more about Thompson model refer to
brainly.com/question/26895062
#SPJ4
Answer:
The Supreme Court decided that the use of prayers to open government meetings in 2014 is constitutional and that such meetings can hold, even if it clearly favors one faith, provided that there is no attempt to harass, intimidate, or coerce other religion believers.
