How effective is the author's response to the counterclaim that the job market for wind power is very limited? Ineffective; the
author cites a source that is not reputable and facts that are unrelated to the counterclaim that the job market for wind power is limited. Ineffective; the author ignores the claim and provides unsupported evidence about the job market for wind power. Effective; the author presents a great deal of information regarding who benefits from wind power, including those seeking employment opportunities in the field. Effective; the author cites various fields of employment that are available in the wind power industry and supports the claim with a reputable source.
What I believe Neil meant by this, is when you study you are coming up with your own conclusions along with others in the past and by creating your own hypothesis' you are creating your own version of the truth. Therefore you are creating knowledge, your own knowledge.
