How effective is the author's response to the counterclaim that the job market for wind power is very limited? Ineffective; the
author cites a source that is not reputable and facts that are unrelated to the counterclaim that the job market for wind power is limited. Ineffective; the author ignores the claim and provides unsupported evidence about the job market for wind power. Effective; the author presents a great deal of information regarding who benefits from wind power, including those seeking employment opportunities in the field. Effective; the author cites various fields of employment that are available in the wind power industry and supports the claim with a reputable source.