Absolutely not. They are important historical artifacts and represent important events. Although some of these events were not morally correct we can use it as a reminder to not repeat the past. Some of these statues are 100’s of years old. Almost no other countries destroy their historical statues due to “sensitivity”. Also keep in mind that erasing these statues would be equivalent to erasing our history and not giving any recognition to those groups of people that suffered.
<span>There is evidence that the monumental decision in Roe v. Wade in 1973 had a direct impact on crime years later. If more poor and unwed women were able to end their pregnancies, fewer poor children were being born into lives of neglect and poverty. Since crime is a natural outgrowth of being poor and disadvantaged, and unwanted, there would be less crime because those people never existed.</span>
One of the things that happened in Europe as a result of the cooling in climate that occurred in the early fourteenth century was "<span>crop failure," since many of the crops needed a certain amount of heat to grow. </span>
Schenck v. United States was a Supreme Court case about the enforcement of the Espionage Act of 1917. I believe the case went straight to the Supreme Court and resulted in the Court's ruling that the criminal conviction of Schenck was in fact constitutional.
