<span>It was a financially sound move, It expanded our military presence in the world, and It expanded our social and political presence in the world. </span>
Senator Beveridge believed that the mission of the United States was the civilization of the world.
As such, he believed that America's expansion into the Philippines was a noble cause as it brought "civilization" to the people of the Philippines.
In the late 1800s a second period of industrial growth was spurred by<span> Developments in processing steel and oil.</span>
When speaking of monastic lifestyle, Southern Buddhism still maintains the primitive style for everyday activities, which were traditionally set up during the time of the Buddha. In other words, monks in Southern Buddhism all wear yellow robes, eat one meal a day at noon, study and recite the Pali sutras, etc. Accordingly, the specific feature of monks in Southern Buddhism is that they all wear the same style of robes with the same color (yellow) and all recite the same canonical language (Pali). For this reason, monks in Southern Buddhism—even from different countries—can sit down and recite the same sutra expertly and skillfully.
<span>On the contrary, monks and nuns in Northern Buddhism do not keep the traditional lifestyle, as primitive Buddhism does. Rather, they adjusted their lifestyles in everyday activities as well as in spiritual practices, relying on different habits, customs, national cultures, and social requirements. Thus, the lifestyles of monks and nuns in Northern Buddhism are diversely dependent on various traditions of different natives. For example, monks and nuns in Northern Buddhism wear different styles of robes with different colors. Canonical languages are translated into different languages, and followers can eat more than one meal a day, depending on health issues. Generally speaking, Northern Buddhism is a form of development by nature; therefore, it has effectively adapted to social needs to become the first priority in the mission of preaching the Dharma. </span>
Answer:
Yes.
Explanation:
Yes, I agree with Sophie’s actions because her daughter would not survive in the labour camp as compared to her son. Sophie choose his son to be sent to the labour camp because she knew that there is more chance of survival of her son as compared to her daughter in that camp. She also wanted him alive as he is favourite to her as compared to her daughter. Her daughter can't survive the hard life of labour camp so dying is good for her in order to safe from the hardships of life.
