1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Dvinal [7]
2 years ago
12

How did the Atlantic slave trade impact the Americas’ role in triangular trade?

History
1 answer:
Anastasy [175]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

i think it is C ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Explanation:

hope this helped!

p.s it would be cool if you gave me brainliest.

You might be interested in
The communists succeeded in overthrowing the Provisional Government in the November 1917 Revolution because __________
Ierofanga [76]
The communists succeeded in overthrowing the Provisional Government in the November 1917 revolution because the Provisional government not only lost the faith and trust of the people of Russia, but they also lost the support of the army. On the other hand, the communists gained the support of the Russian people and this helped in overthrowing the Provisional government. The differences between the Mensheviks and the Bolsheviks also get resolved and this strengthened the hands of the Communist people of Russia.


8 0
2 years ago
4. L E _ D V O _ _ _ *what kind of musical instrument is this
viktelen [127]

Answer:

Human voice

Explanation:

LEAD VOCAL

3 0
3 years ago
A democratic president faced with a republican majority senate is trying to appoint judges to the federal brench. Which of the f
s344n2d4d5 [400]

Answer:

A. a president is more likely to appoint judges who would agree with him ideologically.

Explanation:

According to the Constitution, it is President who nominates judges for federal courts and the Supreme Court. After the nomination, it is Senate who appoint them based on informal criteria, as there's no criteria mentioned in the Constitution.

The most likely reason that appointment of judges by President is blocked is because the president is appointing judges who would agree with him ideologically. The Senate will block such nominations to ensure that judges who are appointed judge with justice and not under any influence from any political power.

Therefore, option A is correct.

7 0
2 years ago
How do historians often describe what motivated 15th century Europeans to explore the rest of the world?
LUCKY_DIMON [66]

“God, Gold, and Glory” is the answer

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why was the United States worried about tyranny?
julsineya [31]

Answer:

Explanation:

History does not repeat, but it does instruct. As the Founding Fathers debated our Constitution, they took instruction from the history they knew. Concerned that the democratic republic they envisioned would collapse, they contemplated the descent of ancient democracies and republics into oligarchy and empire. As they knew, Aristotle warned that inequality brought instability, while Plato believed that demagogues exploited free speech to install themselves as tyrants. In founding a democratic republic upon law and establishing a system of checks and balances, the Founding Fathers sought to avoid the evil that they, like the ancient philosophers, called tyranny. They had in mind the usurpation of power by a single individual or group, or the circumvention of law by rulers for their own benefit. Much of the succeeding political debate in the United States has concerned the problem of tyranny within American society: over slaves and women, for example.

It is thus a primary American tradition to consider history when our political order seems imperiled. If we worry today that the American experiment is threatened by tyranny, we can follow the example of the Founding Fathers and contemplate the history of other democracies and republics. The good news is that we can draw upon more recent and relevant examples than ancient Greece and Rome. The bad news is that the history of modern democracy is also one of decline and fall. Since the American colonies declared their independence from a British monarchy that the Founders deemed “tyrannical,” European history has seen three major democratic moments: after the First World War in 1918, after the Second World War in 1945, and after the end of communism in 1989. Many of the democracies founded at these junctures failed, in circumstances that in some important respects resemble our own.

History can familiarize, and it can warn. In the late 19th century, just as in the late 20th century, the expansion of global trade generated expectations of progress. In the early 20th century, as in the early 21st, these hopes were challenged by new visions of mass politics in which a leader or a party claimed to directly represent the will of the people. European democracies collapsed into right-wing authoritarianism and fascism in the 1920s and ‘30s. The communist Soviet Union, established in 1922, extended its model into Europe in the 1940s. The European history of the 20th century shows us that societies can break, democracies can fall, ethics can collapse, and ordinary men can find themselves standing over death pits with guns in their hands. It would serve us well today to understand why.

Both fascism and communism were responses to globalization: to the real and perceived inequalities it created, and the apparent helplessness of the democracies in addressing them. Fascists rejected reason in the name of will, denying objective truth in favor of a glorious myth articulated by leaders who claimed to give voice to the people. They put a face on globalization, arguing that its complex challenges were the result of a conspiracy against the nation. Fascists ruled for a decade or two, leaving behind an intact intellectual legacy that grows more relevant by the day. Communists ruled for longer, for nearly seven decades in the Soviet Union, and more than four decades in much of Eastern Europe. They proposed rule by a disciplined party elite with a monopoly on reason that would guide society toward a certain future according to supposedly fixed laws of history.

We might be tempted to think that our democratic heritage automatically protects us from such threats. This is a misguided reflex. In fact, the precedent set by the Founders demands that we examine history to understand the deep sources of tyranny, and to consider the proper responses to it. Americans today are no wiser than the Europeans who saw democracy yield to fascism, Nazism, or communism in the 20th century. Our one advantage is that we might learn from their experience. Now is a good time to do so.

In my new book, On Tyranny: Twenty Lessons from the Twentieth Century, I present 20 lessons from the 20th century, adapted to the circumstances of today. The second lesson, “defend institutions,” is especially relevant for labor unions, whose role in defending democracy is explained elsewhere in this issue.

It is institutions that help us to preserve decency. They need our help as well. Do not speak of “our institutions” unless you make them yours by acting on their behalf. Institutions do not protect themselves. They fall one after the other unless each is defended from the beginning. So choose an institution you care about—a court, a newspaper, a law, a labor union—and take its side.

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • The term "Reconstruction" in United States history refers to the period after what event?
    7·1 answer
  • Which US region has a population that is most likely to be dominated by people of Irish, Italian, Puerto Rican, and African Amer
    9·2 answers
  • Which of the following rights were denied to African Americans as a result of Jim Crow laws?
    10·2 answers
  • what was the main reason that henry cabot lodge and the irreconcilables opposed the treaty of versailles in 1919?
    8·1 answer
  • The revival of an extinguished CR (conditioned response) is called:
    13·1 answer
  • How did moving the capital to Constantinople affect the city of Rome?
    13·1 answer
  • Once Kublai Khan took control of China, many of the region's highly educated former government officials were out of work. What
    9·1 answer
  • In the history of India and Hinduism, what group of people did not belong to the caste system and were not protected by caste la
    8·1 answer
  • Which term is defined as the absence of any law and order?
    14·1 answer
  • What were characteristics of life in Athens but not in Sparta?
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!