Answer:
This is my whole responce please paraphrase
Explanation:
In Shirley Chisholm’s Speech “People and Peace, Not Profits and War.” Chisholm uses introduction, narration, confirmation, refutation, and conclusion, all of which are effective in her speech to strengthen her argument that the military should not be pouring so much of the government’s money into the Vietnam War. Chisholm also uses ethos, pathos, and logos to strengthen her argument. An excellent example of Confirmation in Chisholm’s speech is the quote, “The new secretary of health, education, and welfare, Robert Finch, came to the Hill, to tell the House Education and Labor Committee that he thinks we should spend more on education, particularly in city schools. But, he said, unfortunately, we cannot “afford” to, until we have reached some kind of good solution to the Vietnam War.” (30) This quote establishes credibility for Chisholm as she uses the opinion of another credible person to help with the argument of how spending money on the war has consequences for American citizens. Another example that Chisholm uses that fit a classical argument is a narrative” I was one of the many Americans who hoped it would mean that our country would benefit from the fresh perspectives, the new ideas, the different priorities of a leader who had no part in the mistakes of the past. Mr. Nixon had said things like this: “If our cities are to be livable for the next generation, we can delay no longer in launching new approaches to the problems that beset them and to the tensions that tear them apart.” And he said, “When you cut expenditures for education, what you are doing is shortchanging the American future.” (10). Chisholm uses Narration of Nixon’s words and hers to share the dissatisfaction with how Nixon is dealing with the war and the money of America. Her claim is strengthened due to the fact she uses Nixon’s own words against him since Nixon preached many things that he would do, and Chisholm says, “But frankly, I have never cared too much what people say. What I am interested in is what they do.” That statement shows that when Nixon didn't prove his claims together with his actions, Chisholm was quite disappointed. Chisholm's speech does an excellent job of convincing her audience on how we should think of the well-being of Americans and not just war. she uses many rhetorical elements that help her claims.
Oppression and Depth of pain we all carried.
These two options seem like the best answers due to the passion you get from reading them. I would say the other two don't create enough sense of passion.
I hope this helps! :)
1. Someone who is there when another person gets hurt.
2. When two married people split up.
3. Unlikely to occur.
4.
5.
The best way by which a writer can best connect ideas is; by using transitions to create logical relationships among the claim, reasons, and evidence.
<h3>How can a writer best connect ideas more clearly?</h3>
The use of transition words forms the basis for connecting ideas more clearly in essays or other form of the students.
It therefore follows from the fact above that in a bid to revise an essay, the writer can best connect ideas by means of using transition words.
Read more on transition words;
brainly.com/question/1101400
#SPJ1
