Answer and Explanation:
The Journal entry is shown below:-
Cash Dr, 1969.80 (2010 × 98%)
Sales discount Dr, 40.20
To Account receivable $2,010 ($2,200 - $190)
(Being the entry is recorded)
Here we debited the cash and sales discount as it increased the assets and we credited the accounts receivable as it reduced the assets
Answer:
False
Explanation:
The case stated in question statement does not refer to focused differentiation strategy rather it is an example of Focused cost leadership strategy.
Focused cost leadership strategy is one that is competes on price margins targeting a narrow market and setting the price lower than other already existing competitors.
While, on the other end a focused differentiation strategy targets acquiring market by introducing some different product.
Answer:
b) households will save more because they will expect higher taxes in the future
Explanation:
The Ricardian Equivalence proposition is one of the pillars of classical economics, which sadly has proven to not work very well in the real world. According to classical economists, and their quantity theory of money plus the Ricardian Equivalence, recessions do not exist because it is impossible for them to exist. But in the real world, that is not true. Recessions exist, e.g. the US is in a recession since the first quarter of 2020 (even before the current health crisis). When real people lose their jobs or are afraid to lose their jobs, their spending habits change.
On the other hand, when real people get a tax refund or tax cut, they generally spend it, they will not save it to pay future taxes. That is why car sales increase during February after checks form the IRS are handed out.
Theoretically, classical economics is great. The problem is that we are human beings, and as such, our behavior cannot be controlled or determined by what we should or should not do. This is exactly why the velocity of money (quantitative theory of money) is not constant.
Answer:
Lahdekorpi OY, a Finnish corporation and Three-O Company, a subsidiary incorporated in the United States
Transfer Pricing:
a) The best transfer pricing method in this case is the cost plus method. This gives the transfer price as Cost + 50%.
b) The appropriate transfer price should be $3 ($2 x 1.5).
Explanation:
Transfer pricing arises when controlled entities set prices for exchange of goods and services. When Lahdekorpi OY, a Finnish corporation, sells wooden puzzles to Three-O Company, given their relationship, transfer pricing has arisen. It is the assignment of cost for goods and services exchanged between related parties, like a parent and a subsidiary.
There are many Transfer Pricing methods which entities and the taxing authorities can use to determine the best transfer price. According to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Multinational Entities and tax authorities can use any of these five main transfer pricing methods:
a) Comparable uncontrolled price (CUP) method. The CUP method is grouped by the OECD as a traditional transaction method (as opposed to a transactional profit method)
b) Resale price method
c) Cost plus method
d) Transactional net margin method (TNMM)
e) Transactional profit split method.
Answer:
Answer:
a) Monthly payment = $65.95
b) Remaining balance on her loan after making 12th payment = 11,000 - (65.95 x 12) = $10208.6
c) Interest paid in month 13 = 10208.6 * 0.5% = $51.043
Principal paid in month 13 = $65.95 - 51.043 = $14.907
Explanation:
Using financial calculator:
PV = 11,000
n = 30 years = 360 months
i/r = 6%/year = 0.5% / month
FV = 0
PMT = ? (Monthly payment = ?)
a) Monthly payment = $65.95
b) Remaining balance on her loan after making 12th payment = 11,000 - (65.95 x 12) = $10208.6
c) Interest paid in month 13 = 10208.6 * 0.5% = $51.043
Principal paid in month 13 = $65.95 - 51.043 = $14.907
Explanation:
