1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
g100num [7]
3 years ago
15

How would both Karl Marx and Adam Smith respond to Thomas Malthus's ideas regarding poverty? They would have agreed that poverty

was the result of a natural increase in population in relation to food supply. They would have disagreed on the idea that assisting the poor caused them long-term harm. They would have agreed that it was impossible to develop agriculture sufficient to feed any population. They would have disagreed on the idea that war, poverty, disease, and famine were natural checks to population growth.
History
2 answers:
Monica [59]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

  • They would have disagreed on the idea that war, poverty, disease, and famine were natural checks to population growth.

Explanation:

Malthus believed that the populace would dependably expand more quickly than sustenance supply, which implied that substantial quantities of individuals would dependably experience the ill effects of starvation and poverty. His calculations exhibited that while nourishment supply developed at a straight rate, populaces would in general develop at an exponential one.  

Karl Marx felt that populace development would cause things like absence of resources. In the interim, Adam Smith wanted more individuals to be born.

Alexxandr [17]3 years ago
4 0
I think the answer to this question would be <u>“They would have disagreed on the idea that war, poverty, disease, and famine were natural checks to population growth.”   </u>
<span>This based upon that Karl Marx thought that population growth would cause things like lack of resources. Meanwhile, Adam smith wanted more people to be born.</span>
You might be interested in
What created a strong U.S. ally in Asia?
WARRIOR [948]

Answer: Hmmm  :(

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
What other groups besides the ku klux klan worked to reduce support for republicans in the south?
faltersainse [42]
The White League and the Knights of the White Camellia also <span>worked to reduce support for Republicans in the south.

</span>The Knights of the White Camelia was an American political terrorist organization that operated in the southern United States in the 19th century, similar to and associated with the Ku Klux Klan, supporting white<span> supremacy and opposing freedmen's rights. 
</span>The White League<span>, also known as the </span>White<span> Man's </span>League<span>, </span>was an American white<span> paramilitary organization started in 1874 to kick Republicans out of office and intimidate freedmen from voting and politically organizing.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Qhy does one party rule matter to totalitarian states
12345 [234]

The totalitarian states usually don't allow any opposition parties to exist. If some people try to form a party, they usually end up in prison, are banished from the nation, or even murdered.

The reason why the totalitarian rulers prefer a one party system is in order to have all the power in the country, without having opposition that will constantly go public about the terrors and injustices that are happening. If there are more parties, than the people will start to support them, especially cause rarely who likes to live under a totalitarian ruler, thus the totalitarian ruler will face a situation where he/she will lose its power.

3 0
3 years ago
How did the new party system differ geographically from the Second Party System?
nata0808 [166]

Explanation:

The Second Party System, consisting largely of the Democrats and Whigs, ... While Jackson himself did not initiate the changes, he came to symbolize ... differed significantly from earlier presidential contests because of the party ... At the local level, Jackson's supporters worked to bring in as many new voters as possible.

Hope this helps!!!

8 0
3 years ago
What were the effects of world war one in the United States?
exis [7]

Answer:increased persoal income

Explanation:The experience of World War I had a major impact on US domestic politics, culture, and society. Women achieved the right to vote, while other groups of American citizens were subject to systematic repression.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • ________ made up the largest group to settle in the Mexican Cession
    13·2 answers
  • After reading the passage, who would have been the most likely audience to object to the author’s position? Those who embraced t
    5·1 answer
  • The National Reclamation Act directly affected the management of which natural resource?
    8·1 answer
  • What difficulties do you think might arise when trying to understand ideas from the past, especially when those ideas are so dif
    9·2 answers
  • What was the gentlemens agreement?
    13·2 answers
  • Why was there resentment toward mexican landowners
    5·1 answer
  • How did the Federalists secure support for the new constitution?
    12·2 answers
  • Marbury.v Madison Identify one way that this case might have effected how people live in the United States.
    8·1 answer
  • ___ was the only woman, other than Abigail Adams, to have been both the mother and the wife of a President.
    11·2 answers
  • Natural facts about the Iran-Iraq war
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!