He disagree with the revolutions plans, not so much the revolution itself.
Because, he argued not the substitution as such but its programs: the French revolution needed to abolish the past of France and found a new, complex system, they make it work in actuality (and Burke said that it would not work). On the other hand, the American rebellion did not murder the British legacy: the different individual rights, the common law etc. For him, the uprising was supported by the very laws of British law.
Archeaa. Hope This Helps!
The first one is B
and i believe the second is A
.
i hope this helps
.
Zane
Answer:
A) The political institution Dickinson wants to maintain is the English monarchy. He provides a series of reasons in favor of the status quo and against the Revolution. For him, this institution has given the colonists freedom and he believes that establishing a Republic will result in "licentious anarchy and popular tyranny".
B) The English monarchy served as a guide for the colonists "directing them ... to the same object, which is self preservation and happiness". This institution, according to Dickinson, maintained union in the colonies and gave the people freedom. The monarchy "only sustains and governs".
C) Representative democracy is a system in which elected officials represent groups of the population in the government. In the passage, he mentions the Parliament and how it represents the "variety of opinions and diversity of interests", which is what a representative democracy should do. Unfortunately, though, the colonists did not have a direct representative in the Parliament.
Explanation:
