Answer:
B. We all seem to be in basic agreement, so there's no sense in continuing our discussion of this issue."
Explanation:
In a group think, there are some portion of the group members who decided not to challenge the view or principles that held by the group for the sake of not disturbing the harmony in the group.
The statement above is most likely made in order to shut down any chance for members who have opposing views to speak up their opinion so they decided to disregard it rather than acknowledging the difference
The concept of Responsibility to Protect (R2P), developed by the UN, shows the growing importance of human rights by It is criticized for becoming a justification for intervention on behalf of state interests not related to protection of human rights.
<h3>The concept of Responsibility to Protect (R2P)?</h3>
All Heads of State and Government endorsed the duty to safeguard populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity at the 2005 World Summit. Three equally important pillars support the responsibility to protect (commonly abbreviated as "R2P"): the obligation of each State to protect its citizens (pillar I); the obligation of the international community to support States in protecting their citizens (pillar II); and the obligation of the international community to act when a State is blatantly failing to protect its citizens (pillar III). When the concept was adopted in 2005, it was a solemn commitment with high hopes for a world free of these atrocities.
- There are several circumstances in today's world where populations are at risk of R2P crimes or where such crimes are already occurring. These crises are occurring in a climate of waning internationalism, declining adherence to international human rights and humanitarian law, political division in important decision-making bodies like the Security Council, and a degree of defeatism toward advancing ambitious agendas like protection.
- Alarming contempt for core principles of international law has been on display. We are witnessing widespread and egregious attacks on protected civilian sites, such as hospitals and schools, as well as on protected individuals, including humanitarian and health-care workers, in many of the armed conflicts that have broken out in recent years.
- The most severe transgressions of international humanitarian and human rights law, which may qualify as atrocity crimes, continue to be committed by the armed forces and auxiliary militia of States, which is a depressing reality given the rise of violent, non-state armed organizations.
- Similarly, governments do not hold those responsible for atrocity crimes accountable for their deeds. In order to prevent the investigation and prosecution of atrocity crimes, some States parties to the Rome Statute, which established the International Criminal Court, are not collaborating with the Court or are even considering withdrawing from the Statute.
- The Security Council is becoming less willing to bring issues to the Court, and certain political figures obviously want to avoid being held accountable in court.
Learn more about Protect (R2P) here:
brainly.com/question/16179318
#SPJ4
Answer:
Options B & D
Explanation:
Bankruptcy refers to a situation where by a people cannot pay their debts. It involves a legal process.
Option B and D are true.
Many major cities have avoided bankruptcy by being placed under the control of financial control boards by their state governments. As such it they are declared bankrupt by a court are brought under the control of independent trustees whose primary objective is to ensure that obligations to bondholders are satisfied in full.
- A: Per the federal bankruptcy code, a municipality can be declared bankrupt but not insolvent is not true because if you are declared bankrupt, it implies that you are either not paying you loan as due or have stopped paying for a while and it also means you are insolvent. A government can be bankrupt if they cannot pay their debts.
This question is incomplete, here´s the complete question.
¿Sabes identificar las emociones de las personas que te rodean?
¿Cómo lo haces?
Answer: Aunque a veces es difícil, generalemente sí puedo identificar las emociones de quienes me rodean a partir de sus gestos y acciones.
Explanation:
Yo misma suelo intentar ocultar emociones que me hacen sentir vulnerable, como el miedo o la vergüenza. Pero así como yo puedo identificar las emociones de otros a través de sus gestos y acciones, seguramente mis estados de ánimo serán evidentes para quien observa con atención.
Los nervios pueden generar agitación, sudoración, temblor de las manos o cambio en el tono de voz. El enojo puede manifestarse con gestos y miradas que indican ira, e incluso con elevamiento del tono de voz, y el uso de frases agresivas. La alegría puede verse en amplias sonrisas y una fluidez en los movimientos del cuerpo.
Por supuesto, la mejor forma de expresar nuestras emociones es a través del diálogo, no sólo para poder conectarnos unos con otros, sino que además compartir nuestros sentimientos puede ayudarnos a procesarlos.
Answer:
Davis lacks problem solving skills and lacks following instructions correctly.
Explanation:
