Evidence that can be used to modify or refute what Stannard said about Columbus would be (D) examples of long-term benefits for people in Europe and Asia that resulted from the voyages by Columbus.
<h3>What did Stannard think of Columbus?</h3>
David Stannard thinks very lowly of Christopher Columbus as a result of the latter's crimes in North America which included the killing and mutilating of Native Americans.
David Stannard believed that the exploration of the Americas brought only long-term pain to Native Americans so a view that would refute this would have to show descriptions that Native Americans enjoyed some long term benefits thanks to Columbus.
Find out more on Christopher Columbus at brainly.com/question/15581111
#SPJ1
False because there were priests and there were no councils elected by citizens
Tradición es cada una de aquellas pautas de convivencia que una comunidad considera dignas de constituirse (en este caso indígenas). Después de esto sigue como una parte integral de sus usos y costumbres y se mantiene para que sean aprendidas por las nuevas generaciones, como parte indispensable del legado cultural.
Answer:
loyalist and patriot
Explanation:
bro they're literally two sides