1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
r-ruslan [8.4K]
4 years ago
14

Branliest will be marked answer all questions.

History
1 answer:
Aliun [14]4 years ago
7 0

The cost of the war was higher for the South.

Social Structures:

Before the war, the social structure of the South included the white, slave-owning, property-owning white male on the top, followed by the white, property-owning white male, followed by the white women of the society, and then the property-less white male, and finally the slaves. This structure was used specifically to help keep order within the plantations, as those who grow up in such a order would likely stick to it. After the war, the structure was destroyed because of the slaves being freed, which meant that their social structure was changed.

Political Structures:

Before the war, the South had a comparable power to the North, as they found ways to pack Congress with the 3/5th compromise, which allowed 3/5 of a slave to count as a person, which in turn can determine how much people are inside the House of Representatives. However, after breaking away, they first directly lost access to Congress, and after the war, they lost the 3/5th compromise, effectively putting them back to the beginning of having a North-dominating government.

Economic Structures:

The South relied heavily on exportation, specifically tobacco at first to European countries due to the heavy smoking there and the perfect climate & weather to farm tobacco. However, soon the tobacco industry started to fall apart, and with the rise of industrialization, the South turned to farming specifically cotton & other cash crops. However, with them only farming for cash (essentially), they had little put into industry (which was extensively found in the North), leading to a smaller manufacturing output as compared to the North. They relied heavily on imports throughout the war, and capturing Northern equipment. In the following years of the war, the South was essentially razed to the ground (Sherman's March to the Sea is a extremely good example), and they had to essentially rebuild, and without their money-making products, they had a hard time.

Military Structures:

The South already had a smaller population, which led to a smaller army-ratio as compared to the North. In the beginning however, they had better military leaders, such as Stone-wall Jackson, Robert E. Lee, to name a few, which helped them to get decisive wins in the beginning. However, better military tactics is only one of many in which the South needs to take care of. Failure to supply their troops with adequate amounts of equipments and their physical needs meant that they could not win a long, over-drawn war.

The South definitely had a weaker side, and the effects of the war was much more heavily influential on the side of the South. As most of the war was fought in the South, the effects of the war was clearly seen there. Coupled with the loss, the major changes would definitely be in the South.

You might be interested in
Need ASAP
UkoKoshka [18]

Answer:

a

Explanation:

so thats part of slave?

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Some historians have considered the tensions of the 1920's in terms of a rural backlash against a rising urban American. Do you
kap26 [50]
It depends on whether or not you're looking at the early or late 20s. In the early 20s this was likely true, because many farmers saw their income diminishing. In the very late 20s the tension was from the stock market crash.
6 0
3 years ago
What were some alternatives to slave labor?
sdas [7]
Freedom,democracy,human rights,paid employees
7 0
4 years ago
What did Tecumseh want for the Native Americans?
musickatia [10]

Answer:

C. To unify all Native Americans and force the United States to give all Indian tribes the land they deserved

Explanation:

Tecumseh firmly believed that all Indian tribes must settle their differences and unite to retain their lands, culture and freedom. Tecumseh led his followers against the United States in many battles and supported the British during the War of 1812.(https://www.history.com/topics/native-american

-history/tecumseh)

5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How has the Internet affected modern America?
Alenkinab [10]

Answer:

technologies have transformed the way we work, the nature of learning and education, and the methods by which we achieve personal and collective goals. Parents, grandparents, children, and the range of loved ones who form part of the modern family today face new and challenging choices about technology use, access, and control.

Explanation:

Brainliest? :D

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What were the first two western European countries that Germany invaded?
    11·2 answers
  • Indian involvement in World War I helped ensure
    6·2 answers
  • what did alexander hamilton imply were the weaknesses of the present system of government under the articles of confederation
    5·1 answer
  • What best describes Mercantilism?
    12·2 answers
  • Why was the early West considered a "crossroads of culture?"
    11·1 answer
  • How did the yalta conference contribute to the start of the cold war?
    10·1 answer
  • What was the main reason behind the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor?
    14·2 answers
  • What act name Elizabeth the governor of both Church and State
    13·1 answer
  • What were two effects of isolationism on the US?
    15·1 answer
  • What agreement determined the guidelines by which enslaved persons would be counted for purposes
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!