A few years ago I had an English teacher that encouraged "The Oreo Method"; it compares effective constructive criticism to an Oreo cookie.
The filling in the middle was the constructive criticism, but before and after that, you offer positive feedback for the writer.
Pretty self explanatory:
1. Provide one piece of positive feedback first and linger on it for a couple sentences; let them know how important that "thing" is and, in a way, praise them for doing it. This primes them to accept your feedback cause they know how thoroughly you've read and analyzed their work.
2. Offer any and all of the constructive criticism you have; stay subtle and be concise with all your feedback.
3. Offer more positive feedback, as many good things as you can come up with.
By submerging the constructive criticism between positive feedback, you keep their hopes up while still thoroughly conveying weak spots in their work.
I hope this kinda made sense; it's a very self explanatory idea so I had trouble elaborating on it.
Hello. You forgot to show the answer options. the options are:
A) the UCR
B) the NCVS
C) Census data
D) Self report data
Answer:
D) Self report data
Explanation:
Self report data is a type of research widely used in psychology as it allows an evaluator to understand the individual who is responding to the research in a deeper way knowing their motivations and social and psychological reasons for committing certain activities.
This type of research is characterized as a questionnaire with questions that participants must answer on their own. These questions are about the feelings, attitudes and beliefs that the participants would present in some situations.
Answer:
playing with the boy'z but don't have a girlfreand
explanation:
He is speaking to her as if he knows more thank she does when in fact she is more knowledgeable about wealth than him.
