Dear Taylor.
This week I had to write an essay on the end of the Romanov dynasty and although this is an easy topic to find in books and on the internet, I would like to make my essay more diverse in terms of research source and that's when my sister recommended looking for a documentary about the Romanovs, which I did and gave me very good results.
The documentary told the whole story of the Romanov dynasty, until the murder of the last Tzar and his entire family. The documentary focused a lot on all the elements that led to the fall of the last Romanovs in addition to showing curiosities about the personal life of each member of the family.
The documentary helped me a lot to understand this phase of the history of Russia and how it impacted the whole government and society, but in addition, the documentary helped me to have a more humanistic view of family members and understand their anxieties, fears and injustice. Although the documentary showed me that the family needed to harness power, it also showed me that deep down they were just humans prone to mistakes like all of us and did not deserve the end they had. My writing was great and I received several compliments from the teacher, for that reason, I felt entitled to send you the file with the documentary and to know your opinion about it. Wait for your comments anxiously.
All the best.
D.M
The thing about fiber evidence is that it becomes lost, very quickly.
I'll assume that you already know what fiber evidence is.
It's basically any sort of evidence that is thread-like,
such as small threads of cotton, animal hair, or the tiny pieces of a carpet.
Again, fibers fall away, and disperse, very quickly.
After four hours, about 80% of potential fiber evidence is gone.
After 24 hours, about 95% of potential fiber evidence is gone.
The challenge here is to collect fiber evidence as soon as possible.
Time is very crucial.
not only is obtaining the evidence problematic but also is getting to the source of fiber evidence. DNA evidence obtained from fiber evidence is often in small amounts. That is why we have processes like DNA Amplification.
If you have a hair fiber it is challenging in that the dna can be destroyed by hair chemicals or it could be from a wig. Tracing the source, wig if so what is the chemical makeup of the fiber etc.
No because it wouldn't be able to display the exaggeration as it would with dialect.
Explanation:
c.
it keeps the ground clean
