Answer:
1. The author uses the words "undefined", "unbounded" and "immense" to describe the powers of the constitution.
2. Upset: it makes the Congress even more powerful than it’s previous long list of expressed powers
3. A Bill of Rights is necessary to protect the rights of citizens. The proposed Constitution does not do enough.
4. Yes he does, and it matters because if you don’t trust the people in power you wouldn’t have a real nation.
5.He seems more like an Anti-Federalist.
Part Two
1. Unnecessary and dangerous
2. From the Federalist No.84
3. No because he believes that its unnecessary and not needed in the constitution.
4. That the bill of rights is pointless and not realistic for the American people.
5 He is defiantly Anti-Federalist; He goes against everything Federalism is for.
They all have ring-form composition and numerous divine interventions. The setting is about the same and talks about Greek mythology. The struggle is also the same in all of them: to rescue Helen, who is a Greek king from Troy. All of the stories are very similar.
The descriptions and the category that they best describe regarding the eastern and western empires are:
Western Empire:
- Closer to invaders.
- Fewer resources.
- Weaker defenses.
Eastern Empire:
- More diverse.
- Closer to trade routes.
<h3>What were some differences between the Western and Eastern empire?</h3>
The Eastern Roman empire was able to last much longer than the Western empire because they were closer to trade routes. This gave them more resources and made them more diverse.
The Western empire had fewer resources which meant that they could not afford stronger defenses which was made worse by the fact that they were closer to invaders.
Find out more on the Western and Eastern empires at brainly.com/question/18698187
#SPJ1
