Yes that is what it means
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
One of the “don’ts” in analyzing or evaluating a primary source is to avoid recreating the author’s experience of his society.
No, I don't agree with this statement because I consider that in order to truly understand the primary source, a good researcher has to understand the circumstance and the time in which the primary source was created.
This means, if it was during a war or a revolutionary period, the researcher has to understand and think as the author of the source did.
ANd I am clear using my words: understand. Not biasing the records, the facts, or misinterpret the situation, the context, or the facts.
Answer:
D.
Explanation:
The Nationalist Party and the Communist party where the two parties fighting for power before and after WW2. The Communist Party was headed by Mao Zedong and the Nationalists where led by Chang Kai-shek.
<span>The Glorious Revolution led to the creation of the English Bill of Rights. This made England a constitutional monarchy, shifting the balance of power between the monarchy and the parliament greatly in favor of the parliament. This made Britain more democratic because a greater number of people were involved in decision making.</span>
