The passage is here:
<span>Spare the rod and spoil the child."—Ichabod Crane’s scholars certainly were not spoiled.
I would not have it imagined, however, that he was one of those cruel potentates of the school, who joy in the smart of their subjects; on the contrary, he administered justice with discrimination rather than severity; taking the burden off the backs of the weak, and laying it on those of the strong. Your mere puny stripling, that winced at the least flourish of the rod, was passed by with indulgence; but the claims of justice were satisfied by inflicting a double portion on some little, tough, wrong-headed, broad-skirted Dutch urchin, who sulked and swelled and grew dogged and sullen beneath the birch. All this he called "doing his duty by their parents;" and he never inflicted a chastisement without following it by the assurance, so consolatory to the smarting urchin, that "he would remember it, and thank him for it the longest day he had to live."
</span>
The correct answer is "<span>Ichabod was a fair teacher who was misunderstood by his students."</span>
Based on the story, I would say the best word to describe Nadia at the end of the story would be, "accomplished". After seeing her mother in the front row, which reminded her of home and Lucky, she was able to put her fears aside and complete her performance.
Hope this helps.
Take care.
Answer:
this will give her darkness how could I do that to the most special person in the world
The gerund in the sentence is traveling and the purpose is to act as the subject.
Universal health care is the most debated public health care program in the US. This is a kind of health program that seeks to be funded by the tax payer and is issued by the government. The argument is the benefit it will incur or as some individuals agitate the kind of loses it will bring to the entire economy. According to my cost benefit analysis, I find it more surprising that there is nothing to argue about since health is wealth, the healthier the nation the richer it is. The critics to the above program which is being supported by the current US government should refrain from such kind of action and go back to the drawing board to check the benefit of the overall insurance program. I argue the case in terms of utilitarianism, I base my findings on the morals that worth an action, an action that is purely determined by its utility in enhancing equitable assumption of happiness in the entire nation.
Explanation:
(happy to help)
