Answer:
D) Their behaviors are the result of the interaction of nature and nurture.
Explanation:
The "nature versus nurture" debate is a centuries-old debate about what determines human behavior. This debate becomes more heated when discussing the actions of certain individuals that have been universally reviled, like dictator Adolf Hitler, serial killer Ted Bundy, and Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh. Were they born "evil", or did they become "evil". According to researcher Matt Riley, on his <em>Nature via Nurture</em> book, the relation between nature and nurture isn't one dominating over the other, or a simple causal relationship of one creating the other. Rather, there exists a dialectical relationship between both. In other words, the <u>behaviors of the men listed above are the result of the interaction of nature and nurture</u>, where each one of these can't explain their actions alone and by itself. Rather, it is the interaction between their genetic makeup and their particular life experiences that created their personalities.
Answer:
Unconditioned Stimulus: Eating fois gras
Unconditioned Response: Nausea
Neutral Stimulus/Conditioned Stimulus: Seeing or thinking about fois gras
Conditioned Response: Nausea
Explanation:
Taste Aversion happens when a specific type of food causes a person to feel sick even if that particular dish was not even the reason why that person felt those horrible symptoms. However, classic conditioning occurs and said person will associate those symptoms to that particular food from that point on. Just like Pavlov's dog would salivate when the bell rang, so will the person will feel sick everytime they see or think about the food that made them sick.
The answer is C. to join forces against america because their idea was to enhance wealth and focus on their economy.
The answer to your question is,
Frederick III, German Emperor.
-Mabel <3
<span>Persist until the problem is recognized</span>