I agree with the other person - the correct answer should be <span> A. The difficulty of running such a large territory.
The Roman Empire was huge - it had many territories in Europe, North Africa, and the Middle East, so it encompassed such a large area that it was too difficult to govern smoothly. This is why it was split into two areas so as to make things easier.
</span>
The shift of people from the rural to urban areas of Texas is what is known as Urbanization.
<h3>What is urbanization?</h3>
This is the movement of people from areas that they consider as rural areas to other areas that are towns or urban areas.
There are several reasons for such movements.
- Employment
- Good facilities
- Better opportunities
Read more on urbanization here:
brainly.com/question/12007420
Answer:
The leaders of the United Kingdom
the United States
The Soviet Union met at the Potsdam Conference.
If there are any choices please add them and i will figure it out.
Answer:
Because fort Sumter allowed the confederates to create a valuable hole in the union
Explanation:
Answer:
O. Periodic appointments would destroy a judge's independence.
Explanation:
Alexander Hamilton wrote in his "Federalist Papers No. 78" how the independence of judges is important for the security of everyone. Stating that <em>"the general liberty of the people can never be endangered .... so long as the judiciary remains truly distinct from both the legislature and the Executive"</em>. He further went to demand that <em>"independence of the judges is equally requisite to guard the Constitution and the rights of individuals"</em>. He believes that independence of the judiciary from either the legislative or executive is a much needed act, for it will ensure the right and correct implementation of judgement. He proposed that <em>"complete independence of the courts of justice is peculiarly essential in a limited Constitution"</em>.
Moreover, judges' permanent appointment will ensure the rightful passing of judgement which can be flawed if the judges are appointed periodically. For no two persons are the same, so this may lead to differences in opinions which will lead to the former judgement being recanted by the next person appointed. Thus, he opines that <em>"periodical appointments, however regulated, or by whomsoever made, would, in some way or other, be fatal to their necessary independence"</em>.
Thus, the correct answer is the third option.
